Infliximab for Diabetic Macular Edema Refractory to Laser Photocoagulation

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Infliximab for Diabetic Macular Edema Refractory to Laser Photocoagulation
المؤلفون: Evi Delicha, Petros P. Sfikakis, Panayiotis G. Theodossiadis, Kleopatra Alexiadou, Ioannis Emfietzoglou, Vlassis G. Grigoropoulos, George Theodossiadis, Christina G. Katsiari, Erifili Hatziagelaki, Nicholas Tentolouris
المصدر: Diabetes Care
بيانات النشر: American Diabetes Association, 2010.
سنة النشر: 2010
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Visual acuity, Randomization, genetic structures, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, medicine.medical_treatment, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Visual Acuity, Placebo, Macular Edema, Placebos, Double-Blind Method, Ophthalmology, Internal Medicine, medicine, Humans, Macular edema, Original Research, Aged, Advanced and Specialized Nursing, Cross-Over Studies, Diabetic Retinopathy, Laser Coagulation, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, business.industry, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Diabetic retinopathy, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Crossover study, Infliximab, Surgery, Treatment Outcome, Female, medicine.symptom, business, Laser coagulation, medicine.drug
الوصف: OBJECTIVE Because many patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) do not respond to focal/grid laser photocoagulation, the only currently approved treatment, alternatives are needed. Based on encouraging preliminary findings, we aimed to assess efficacy and safety of the anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody infliximab in this condition. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Eleven patients with sight-threatening DME persisting after two sessions of laser photocoagulation received infliximab (5 mg/kg) intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14, followed by placebo at weeks 16, 18, 22, and 30, or vice versa. Blinding was maintained to week 32, when the final assessments were performed. Best corrected visual acuity evaluated by a mixed-models approach for imbalanced crossover design using the percentage difference as the outcome variable was the primary study end point. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores dropped from 31.6 ± 5.1 (mean ± SD) letters read at baseline to 28.8 ± 11.6 letters read at week 16 in six placebo-treated eyes and improved to 35.4 ± 11.2 letters read after infliximab. In contrast, visual acuity improved from 23.5 ± 10.3 at baseline to 30.4 ± 13.4 letters read at week 16 in eight infliximab-treated eyes and was sustained at completion of placebo treatment (31.4 ± 12.1 letters read). The excess visual acuity in infliximab-treated eyes was greater by 24.3% compared with that in placebo-treated eyes (95% CI 4.8–43.7; P = 0.017). Infliximab treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS The positive results of this small phase III study suggest that larger and longer term trials should be conducted to assess the efficacy of systemic or intravitreal anti-TNF agent administration for primary treatment of DME.
تدمد: 1935-5548
0149-5992
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::7db1b03f8f6c0d6ee5e90eaf31eb65baTest
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-2372Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....7db1b03f8f6c0d6ee5e90eaf31eb65ba
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE