Glycemic Outcome Associated With Insulin Pump and Glucose Sensor Use in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. Data From the International Pediatric Registry SWEET

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Glycemic Outcome Associated With Insulin Pump and Glucose Sensor Use in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. Data From the International Pediatric Registry SWEET
المؤلفون: Cardona-Hernandez R, Schwandt A, Alkandari H, Bratke H, Chobot A, Coles N, Corathers S, Goksen D, Goss P, Imane Z, Nagl K, O'Riordan SMP, Jefferies C, SWEET Study Group
المصدر: Diabetes Care
r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
instname
r-FSJD: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
بيانات النشر: AMER DIABETES ASSOC, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
الوصف: OBJECTIVE: Insulin delivery methods, glucose-monitoring modalities, and related outcomes were examined in a large, international, diverse cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the Better Control in Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes: Working to Create Centers of Reference (SWEET) -Registry. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants with type 1 diabetes of =1 year, aged =18 years, and who had documented pump or sensor usage during the period August 2017-July 2019 were stratified into four categories: injections-no sensor (referent); injections + sensor; pump-no sensor; and pump + sensor. HbA(1c) and proportion of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or severe hypoglycemia (SH) were analyzed; linear and logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, region, and gross domestic product per capita were applied. RESULTS: Data of 25,654 participants were analyzed. The proportions of participants (adjusted HbA(1c) data) by study group were as follows: injections-no sensor group, 37.44% (8.72; 95% CI 8.68-8.75); injections + sensor group, 14.98% (8.30; 95% CI 8.25-8.35); pump-no sensor group, 17.22% (8.07; 95% CI 8.03-8.12); and pump + sensor group, 30.35% (7.81; 95% CI 7.77-7.84). HbA(1c) was lower in all categories of participants who used a pump and/or sensor compared with the injections-no sensor treatment method (P < 0.001). The proportion of DKA episodes was lower in participants in the pump + sensor (1.98%; 95% CI 1.64-2.48; P < 0.001) and the pump-no sensor (2.02%; 95% CI 1.64-2.48; P < 0.05) groups when compared with those in the injections-no sensor group (2.91%; 95% CI 2.59-3.31). The proportion of participants experiencing SH was lower in pump-no sensor group (1.10%; 95% CI 0.85-1.43; P < 0.001) but higher in the injections + sensor group (4.25%; 95% CI 3.65-4.95; P < 0.001) compared with the injections-no sensor group (2.35%; 95% CI 2.04-2.71). CONCLUSIONS: Lower HbA(1c) and fewer DKA episodes were observed in participants using either a pump or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) or both. Pump use was associated with a lower rate of SH. Across SWEET centers, use of pumps and CGM is increasing. The concomitant use of pump and CGM was associated with an additive benefit.
تدمد: 0149-5992
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::360bda2aa5297181fdabf00dc4b236c9Test
http://fundanet.fsjd.org/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=19258Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.dedup.wf.001..360bda2aa5297181fdabf00dc4b236c9
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE