المؤلفون: Spurgin, Lewis G, Bosse, Mirte, Adriaensen, Frank, Albayrak, Tamer, Barboutis, Christos, Belda, Eduardo, Bushuev, Andrey, Cecere, Jacopo G, Charmantier, Anne, Cichon, Mariusz, Dingemanse, Niels J, Doligez, Blandine, Eeva, Tapio, Erikstad, Kjell Einar, Fedorov, Vyacheslav, Griggio, Matteo, Heylen, Dieter, Hille, Sabine, Hinde, Camilla A, Ivankina, Elena, Kempenaers, Bart, Kerimov, Anvar, Krist, Milos, Kvist, Laura, Laine, Veronika N, Mänd, Raivo, Matthysen, Erik, Nager, Ruedi, Nikolov, Boris P, Norte, Ana Claudia, Orell, Markku, Ouyang, Jenny, Petrova-Dinkova, Gergana, Richner, Heinz, Rubolini, Diego, Slagsvold, Tore, Tilgar, Vallo, Török, János, Tschirren, Barbara, Vágási, Csongor I, Yuta, Teru, Groenen, Martien A M, Visser, Marcel E, van Oers, Kees, Sheldon, Ben C, Slate, Jon

مصطلحات موضوعية: 570 Life sciences, biology

الوصف: A major aim of evolutionary biology is to understand why patterns of genomic diversity vary within taxa and space. Large-scale genomic studies of widespread species are useful for studying how environment and demography shape patterns of genomic divergence. Here, we describe one of the most geographically comprehensive surveys of genomic variation in a wild vertebrate to date; the great tit (Parus major) HapMap project. We screened ca 500,000 SNP markers across 647 individuals from 29 populations, spanning ~30 degrees of latitude and 40 degrees of longitude - almost the entire geographical range of the European subspecies. Genome-wide variation was consistent with a recent colonisation across Europe from a South-East European refugium, with bottlenecks and reduced genetic diversity in island populations. Differentiation across the genome was highly heterogeneous, with clear 'islands of differentiation', even among populations with very low levels of genome-wide differentiation. Low local recombination rates ...

العلاقة: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13969Test

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.48350/19682010.1111/1755-0998.13969Test
https://boris.unibe.ch/196820/

المؤلفون: White, Rachel L., Strubbe, Diederik, Dallimer, Martin, Davies, Zoe G., Davis, Amy J.S., Edelaar, Pim, Groombridge, Jim, Jackson, Hazel A., Menchetti, Mattia, Mori, Emiliano, Nikolov, Boris P., Pârâu, Liviu G., Pečnikar, Živa F., Pett, Tristan J., Reino, Luís, Tollington, Simon, Turbé, Anne, Shwartz, Assaf

المصدر: NeoBiota 48 45-69

مصطلحات موضوعية: evidence base, impact assessment, invasive alien species, monk parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus), ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri), Psittaciformes

الوصف: Globally, the number of invasive alien species (IAS) continues to increase and management and policy responses typically need to be adopted before conclusive empirical evidence on their environmental and socioeconomic impacts are available. Consequently, numerous protocols exist for assessing IAS impacts and differ considerably in which evidence they include. However, inclusive strategies for building a transparent evidence base underlying IAS impact assessments are lacking, potentially affecting our ability to reliably identify priority IAS. Using alien parrots in Europe as a case study, here we apply an evidence-mapping scheme to classify impact evidence and evaluate the consequences of accepting different subsets of available evidence on impact assessment outcomes. We collected environmental and socioeconomic impact data in multiple languages using a "wiki-review" process, comprising a systematic evidence search and an online editing and consultation phase. Evidence was classified by parrot species, impact category (e.g. infrastructure), geographical area (e.g. native range), source type (e.g. peer-review), study design (e.g. experimental) and impact direction (deleterious, beneficial and no impact). Our comprehensive database comprised 386 impact entries from 233 sources. Most evidence was anecdotal (50%). A total of 42% of entries reported damage to agriculture (mainly in native ranges), while within Europe most entries concerned interspecific competition (39%). We demonstrate that the types of evidence included in assessments can strongly influence impact severity scores. For example, including evidence from the native range or anecdotal evidence resulted in an overall switch from minimal-moderate to moderate-major overall impact scores. We advise using such an evidence-mapping approach to create an inclusive and updatable database as the foundation for more transparent IAS impact assessments. When openly shared, such evidence-mapping can help better inform IAS research, management and policy.

العلاقة: https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslitTest; https://zenodo.org/record/3346109Test; https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222Test; oai:zenodo.org:3346109

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222Test
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222.suppl1Test
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222.suppl2Test
https://zenodo.org/record/3346109Test

المؤلفون: White, Rachel L., Strubbe, Diederik, Dallimer, Martin, Davies, Zoe G., Davis, Amy J. S., Edelaar, Pim, Groombridge, Jim, Jackson, Hazel A., Menchetti, Mattia, Mori, Emiliano, Nikolov, Boris P., Pârâu, Liviu G., Pecnikar, Živa F., Pett, Tristan J., Reino, Luís, Tollington, Simon, Turbé, Anne, Shwartz, Assaf

المساهمون: European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Danish National Research Foundation, European Commission

مصطلحات موضوعية: evidence base, impact assessment, invasive alien species, monk parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus), Ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri), Psittaciformes

الوصف: Globally, the number of invasive alien species (IAS) continues to increase and management and policy responses typically need to be adopted before conclusive empirical evidence on their environmental and socioeconomic impacts are available. Consequently, numerous protocols exist for assessing IAS impacts and differ considerably in which evidence they include. However, inclusive strategies for building a transparent evidence base underlying IAS impact assessments are lacking, potentially affecting our ability to reliably identify priority IAS. Using alien parrots in Europe as a case study, here we apply an evidence-mapping scheme to classify impact evidence and evaluate the consequences of accepting different subsets of available evidence on impact assessment outcomes. We collected environmental and socioeconomic impact data in multiple languages using a >wiki-review> process, comprising a systematic evidence search and an online editing and consultation phase. Evidence was classified by parrot species, impact category (e.g. infrastructure), geographical area (e.g. native range), source type (e.g. peer-review), study design (e.g. experimental) and impact direction (deleterious, beneficial and no impact). Our comprehensive database comprised 386 impact entries from 233 sources. Most evidence was anecdotal (50%). A total of 42% of entries reported damage to agriculture (mainly in native ranges), while within Europe most entries concerned interspecific competition (39%). We demonstrate that the types of evidence included in assessments can strongly influence impact severity scores. For example, including evidence from the native range or anecdotal evidence resulted in an overall switch from minimal-moderate to moderate-major overall impact scores. We advise using such an evidence-mapping approach to create an inclusive and updatable database as the foundation for more transparent IAS impact assessments. When openly shared, such evidence-mapping can help better inform IAS research, management and policy. ; We ...

العلاقة: #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/706318; Publisher's version; http://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222Test; Sí; e-issn: 1314-2488; NeoBiota: 45-69 (2019); http://hdl.handle.net/10261/210973Test; http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780Test; http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000921Test; http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001732Test

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222Test
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000780Test
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000921Test
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001732Test
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/210973Test

المؤلفون: White, Rachel L., Strubbe, Diederik, Dallimer, Martin, Davies, Zoe G., Davis, Amy J.S., Edelaar, Pim, Groombridge, Jim, Jackson, Hazel A., Menchetti, Mattia, Mori, Emiliano, Nikolov, Boris P., Pârâu, Liviu G., Pečnikar, Živa F., Pett, Tristan J., Reino, Luís, Tollington, Simon, Turbé, Anne, Shwartz, Assaf

المصدر: NeoBiota 48 45-69

مصطلحات موضوعية: evidence base, impact assessment, invasive alien species, monk parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus), ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri), Psittaciformes, envir, demo

الوصف: Globally, the number of invasive alien species (IAS) continues to increase and management and policy responses typically need to be adopted before conclusive empirical evidence on their environmental and socioeconomic impacts are available. Consequently, numerous protocols exist for assessing IAS impacts and differ considerably in which evidence they include. However, inclusive strategies for building a transparent evidence base underlying IAS impact assessments are lacking, potentially affecting our ability to reliably identify priority IAS. Using alien parrots in Europe as a case study, here we apply an evidence-mapping scheme to classify impact evidence and evaluate the consequences of accepting different subsets of available evidence on impact assessment outcomes. We collected environmental and socioeconomic impact data in multiple languages using a "wiki-review" process, comprising a systematic evidence search and an online editing and consultation phase. Evidence was classified by parrot species, impact category (e.g. infrastructure), geographical area (e.g. native range), source type (e.g. peer-review), study design (e.g. experimental) and impact direction (deleterious, beneficial and no impact). Our comprehensive database comprised 386 impact entries from 233 sources. Most evidence was anecdotal (50%). A total of 42% of entries reported damage to agriculture (mainly in native ranges), while within Europe most entries concerned interspecific competition (39%). We demonstrate that the types of evidence included in assessments can strongly influence impact severity scores. For example, including evidence from the native range or anecdotal evidence resulted in an overall switch from minimal-moderate to moderate-major overall impact scores. We advise using such an evidence-mapping approach to create an inclusive and updatable database as the foundation for more transparent IAS impact assessments. When openly shared, such evidence-mapping can help better inform IAS research, management and policy.

العلاقة: https://zenodo.org/record/3346109Test

الإتاحة: https://zenodo.org/record/3346109Test

المؤلفون: White, Rachel L., Strubbe, Diederik, Dallimer, Martin, Davies, Zoe G., Davis, Amy J.S., Edelaar, Pim, Groombridge, Jim, Jackson, Hazel A., Menchetti, Mattia, Mori, Emiliano, Nikolov, Boris P., Pârâu, Liviu G., Pečnikar, Živa F., Pett, Tristan J., Reino, Luís, Tollington, Simon, Turbé, Anne, Shwartz, Assaf

مصطلحات موضوعية: evidence base, impact assessment, invasive alien species, monk parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus), ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri), Psittaciformes

الوصف: Data type: background, description, measurement

العلاقة: https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslitTest; https://zenodo.org/record/3346176Test; https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222.suppl1Test; oai:zenodo.org:3346176

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222.suppl1Test
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222Test
https://zenodo.org/record/3346176Test

المؤلفون: White, Rachel L., Strubbe, Diederik, Dallimer, Martin, Davies, Zoe G., Davis, Amy J.S., Edelaar, Pim, Groombridge, Jim, Jackson, Hazel A., Menchetti, Mattia, Mori, Emiliano, Nikolov, Boris P., Pârâu, Liviu G., Pečnikar, Živa F., Pett, Tristan J., Reino, Luís, Tollington, Simon, Turbé, Anne, Shwartz, Assaf

مصطلحات موضوعية: evidence base, impact assessment, invasive alien species, monk parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus), ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri), Psittaciformes

الوصف: Data type: description, measurement

العلاقة: https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslitTest; https://zenodo.org/record/3346178Test; https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222.suppl2Test; oai:zenodo.org:3346178

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222.suppl2Test
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.48.34222Test
https://zenodo.org/record/3346178Test

المؤلفون: Najdenski, Hristo, Dimova, Tanya, Zaharieva, Maya M., Nikolov, Boris P., Petrova-Dinkova , Gergana, Dalakchieva, Svetla, Popov, Konstantin S., Hristova-Nikolova , Iva P., Zehtindjiev , Pavel, Peev, Strahil G, Trifonova-Hristova , Anetka, Carniel, Elisabeth, Panferova , Yulia A., Tokarevich , Nikolay K.

الوصف: At the crossroad between Europe, Asia and Africa, Bulgaria is part of the Mediterranean/Black Sea Flyway (MBSF) used by millions of migratory birds. In this study bird species migrating through Bulgaria were investigated as carriers of zoonotic pathogens. In total, 706 birds belonging to 46 species were checked for the presence of various bacterial pathogens (Campylobacter, Yersinia, Salmonella, Listeria, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Francisella tularensis, Coxiella burnetii, Borrelia burgdorferi and Brucella spp). We detected Campylobacter 16S rDNA gene in 1.3% of birds, but none were pathogenic species. E. coli 16S rDNA gene was found in 8.8% of the birds. Out of 34 birds that transported Y. enterocolitica strains (5.05%), only one carried a pathogenic isolate. Three birds (0.4%) were carriers of non-pathogenic Salmonella strains. Four avian samples (0.6%) were positive for Listeria monocytogenes and one (0.15 %) - for Brucella spp. None of the birds tested carried the tick-borne pathogens C. burnetii or B. burgdorferi s.l. Antibiotic resistant strains were detected, suggesting that migratory birds could be reservoirs and spreaders of bacterial pathogens as well as antibiotic resistance genes. ; The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author.

العلاقة: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/91160Test

الإتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/91160Test