يعرض 1 - 7 نتائج من 7 نتيجة بحث عن '"Fiat money"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.70s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1

    المؤلفون: 清水, 真志, Shimizu, Masashi

    الوصف: マルクス経済学の貨幣論研究は,今日,著しい新展開を遂げつつある。「商品貨幣の分岐構造」にかんする小幡道昭の理論に影響を受けた若手研究者たちによって,価値形態論の次元で商品貨幣としての信用貨幣を導出するためのプランが次々と提起されつつある。それはまた,長年にわたってマルクス貨幣論を束縛してきたメタリズムとノミナリズムとの不毛な対立を乗り越えるためのプランでもある。本稿の前半部では,特に画期的なプランを提起している江原慶らの信用貨幣論を取り上げて,その内容を批判的に検討することで,現代マルクス貨幣論の理論的な到達点を探る。また本稿の後半部では,この到達点のさらなる先を目指した小幡の最新の論文「貨幣変容の構造論」を取り上げて,その内容を批判的に検討することで,現代マルクス貨幣論の方法論的な基礎を掘り下げる。併せて,筆者自身の貨幣論研究のプログラムも策定する。 ; departmental bulletin paper

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    العلاقة: 専修経済学論集; 58; 76; AN00132359; https://senshu-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000451/files/1011_0147_06.pdfTest

  2. 2

    المصدر: 社会科学論集 = SHAKAIKAGAKU-RONSHU (The Social Science Review). :43-58

    الوصف: This study analyses the major approaches to frameworks for understanding money. These approaches include those taken by the Marxian, post-Keynesian, and neo-classical schools, and sociologists. The theory of money and credit involves deeply controversial issues. Since the 1970s, financial speculation has been spreading more deeply within global capitalism. The sub-prime mortgage loan problem in the United States was one consequence of this phenomenon. The situation demands an inquiry into the basic question, ‘What is money’ ? In the 2000s, the journal Economy & Society presented an interdisciplinary exchange of opinions and criticism with respect to the traditional understanding of money in mainstream economics, that is, money as the medium of exchange. From a sociological viewpoint, Zelizer(2000) emphasises that money has ‘special’ implications when viewed with regard to different situations, thus it cannot be encapsulated by any single concept. On the other hand, from the viewpoint of post-Keynesian economics, Ingham(2001, 2004) insists that money is the social relation between debts and credits as represented by the money of account. However, from a Marxist viewpoint, Lapavitsas(2005b) understands money as the ‘monopolization of the ability to buy’. Thus, the concept of money has been interpreted in various ways by researchers in different disciplines. Nevertheless, these researchers all conclude that ‘fiat money’ is one of the conditions of money. However, some Japanese Marxian political economists have developed an alternative view which states that pure ‘fiat money’ cannot be explained in principle and does not exist in practice. On the basis of these Japanese studies, we analyse the relationship among these views and attempt to unravel the basic question, ‘What is money’ ?

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
    تقرير

    المؤلفون: 泉 正樹, 結城 剛志

    الوصف: This study analyses the major approaches to frameworks for understanding money. These approaches include those taken by the Marxian, post-Keynesian, and neo-classical schools, and sociologists. The theory of money and credit involves deeply controversial issues. Since the 1970s, financial speculation has been spreading more deeply within global capitalism. The sub-prime mortgage loan problem in the United States was one consequence of this phenomenon. The situation demands an inquiry into the basic question, ‘What is money’ ? In the 2000s, the journal Economy & Society presented an interdisciplinary exchange of opinions and criticism with respect to the traditional understanding of money in mainstream economics, that is, money as the medium of exchange. From a sociological viewpoint, Zelizer(2000) emphasises that money has ‘special’ implications when viewed with regard to different situations, thus it cannot be encapsulated by any single concept. On the other hand, from the viewpoint of post-Keynesian economics, Ingham(2001, 2004) insists that money is the social relation between debts and credits as represented by the money of account. However, from a Marxist viewpoint, Lapavitsas(2005b) understands money as the ‘monopolization of the ability to buy’. Thus, the concept of money has been interpreted in various ways by researchers in different disciplines. Nevertheless, these researchers all conclude that ‘fiat money’ is one of the conditions of money. However, some Japanese Marxian political economists have developed an alternative view which states that pure ‘fiat money’ cannot be explained in principle and does not exist in practice. On the basis of these Japanese studies, we analyse the relationship among these views and attempt to unravel the basic question, ‘What is money’ ?

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  6. 6
  7. 7