التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Randomized Crossover Comparison of Personalized MPC and PID Control Algorithms for the Artificial Pancreas. |
| المؤلفون: |
Pinsker, Jordan E., Joon Bok Lee, Dassau, Eyal, Seborg, Dale E., Bradley, Paige K., Gondhalekar, Ravi, Bevier, Wendy C., Huyett, Lauren, Zisser, Howard C., Doyle III, Francis J., Lee, Joon Bok, Doyle, Francis J 3rd |
| المصدر: |
Diabetes Care; Jul2016, Vol. 39 Issue 7, p1135-1142, 8p, 1 Diagram, 1 Chart, 2 Graphs |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
ARTIFICIAL pancreases, ARTIFICIAL organs, PANCREAS transplantation, GLUCOSE, PHYSIOLOGICAL effects of glucose, THERAPEUTICS, HYPOGLYCEMIA, TREATMENT of diabetes, ALGORITHMS, BLOOD sugar, COMPARATIVE studies, CROSSOVER trials, HYPOGLYCEMIC agents, INSULIN, INSULIN pumps, TYPE 1 diabetes, RESEARCH methodology, MEDICAL cooperation, RESEARCH, RESEARCH funding, STATISTICAL sampling, PILOT projects, EVALUATION research, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, PREVENTION |
| مستخلص: |
Objective: To evaluate two widely used control algorithms for an artificial pancreas (AP) under nonideal but comparable clinical conditions.Research Design and Methods: After a pilot safety and feasibility study (n = 10), closed-loop control (CLC) was evaluated in a randomized, crossover trial of 20 additional adults with type 1 diabetes. Personalized model predictive control (MPC) and proportional integral derivative (PID) algorithms were compared in supervised 27.5-h CLC sessions. Challenges included overnight control after a 65-g dinner, response to a 50-g breakfast, and response to an unannounced 65-g lunch. Boluses of announced dinner and breakfast meals were given at mealtime. The primary outcome was time in glucose range 70-180 mg/dL.Results: Mean time in range 70-180 mg/dL was greater for MPC than for PID (74.4 vs. 63.7%, P = 0.020). Mean glucose was also lower for MPC than PID during the entire trial duration (138 vs. 160 mg/dL, P = 0.012) and 5 h after the unannounced 65-g meal (181 vs. 220 mg/dL, P = 0.019). There was no significant difference in time with glucose <70 mg/dL throughout the trial period.Conclusions: This first comprehensive study to compare MPC and PID control for the AP indicates that MPC performed particularly well, achieving nearly 75% time in the target range, including the unannounced meal. Although both forms of CLC provided safe and effective glucose management, MPC performed as well or better than PID in all metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Diabetes Care is the property of American Diabetes Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder