Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients
المؤلفون: Marden André Tebet, Mônica Vieira Athanazio de Andrade, Vinicius Esteves, Alexandre Abizaid, Luiz Alberto Mattos, Joao Italo Dias França, Pedro Beraldo de Andrade, Robson Alves Barbosa, Amanda G. M. R. Sousa, André Labrunie, Fábio Salerno Rinaldi, Ederlon Ferreira Nogueira
المصدر: Trials
سنة النشر: 2013
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, Acute coronary syndrome, Time Factors, medicine.medical_treatment, Myocardial Infarction, Medicine (miscellaneous), Hemorrhage, Punctures, Bed rest, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Clinical Protocols, Angioplasty, Internal medicine, medicine.artery, medicine, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Vascular closure device, Myocardial infarction, Radial artery, Radial approach, business.industry, Hemostatic Techniques, Methodology, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Access site complication, Equipment Design, medicine.disease, Surgery, Femoral approach, Femoral Artery, Treatment Outcome, Research Design, Hemostasis, Radial Artery, Cardiology, business, Brazil
الوصف: Background Arterial access is a major site of bleeding complications after invasive coronary procedures. Among strategies to decrease vascular complications, the radial approach is an established one. Vascular closure devices provide more comfort to patients and decrease hemostasis and need for bed rest. However, the inconsistency of data proving their safety limits their routine adoption as a strategy to prevent vascular complications, requiring evidence through adequately designed randomized trials. The aim of this study is to compare the radial versus femoral approach using a vascular closure device for the incidence of arterial puncture site vascular complications among non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients submitted to an early invasive strategy. Methods ARISE is a national, multicenter, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. Two hundred patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome will be randomized to either radial or femoral access using a vascular closure device. The primary outcome is the occurrence of vascular complications at an arterial puncture site 30 days after the procedure, including major bleeding, retroperitoneal hematoma, compartment syndrome, hematoma ≥ 5 cm, pseudoaneurysm, arterio-venous fistula, infection, limb ischemia, arterial occlusion, adjacent nerve injury or the need for vascular surgical repair. Results Enrollment was initiated in September 2012, and until October 2013 91 patients were included. The inclusion phase is expected to last until the second half of 2014. Conclusions The ARISE trial will help define the role of a vascular closure device as a bleeding avoidance strategy in patients with NSTEACS. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01653587
تدمد: 1745-6215
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::75dbb7ed677b8aa162a8aec922d15154Test
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24345099Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....75dbb7ed677b8aa162a8aec922d15154
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE