التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Comparing deep learning and pathologist quantification of cell-level PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer whole-slide images. |
| المؤلفون: |
van Eekelen, Leander, Spronck, Joey, Looijen-Salamon, Monika, Vos, Shoko, Munari, Enrico, Girolami, Ilaria, Eccher, Albino, Acs, Balazs, Boyaci, Ceren, de Souza, Gabriel Silva, Demirel-Andishmand, Muradije, Meesters, Luca Dulce, Zegers, Daan, van der Woude, Lieke, Theelen, Willemijn, van den Heuvel, Michel, Grünberg, Katrien, van Ginneken, Bram, van der Laak, Jeroen, Ciompi, Francesco |
| المصدر: |
Scientific Reports; 3/26/2024, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1-10, 10p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
DEEP learning, NON-small-cell lung carcinoma, PROGRAMMED death-ligand 1, MACHINE learning, COMPUTER vision, PATHOLOGISTS |
| مستخلص: |
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is currently used in the clinic to assess eligibility for immune-checkpoint inhibitors via the tumor proportion score (TPS), but its efficacy is limited by high interobserver variability. Multiple papers have presented systems for the automatic quantification of TPS, but none report on the task of determining cell-level PD-L1 expression and often reserve their evaluation to a single PD-L1 monoclonal antibody or clinical center. In this paper, we report on a deep learning algorithm for detecting PD-L1 negative and positive tumor cells at a cellular level and evaluate it on a cell-level reference standard established by six readers on a multi-centric, multi PD-L1 assay dataset. This reference standard also provides for the first time a benchmark for computer vision algorithms. In addition, in line with other papers, we also evaluate our algorithm at slide-level by measuring the agreement between the algorithm and six pathologists on TPS quantification. We find a moderately low interobserver agreement at cell-level level (mean reader-reader F1 score = 0.68) which our algorithm sits slightly under (mean reader-AI F1 score = 0.55), especially for cases from the clinical center not included in the training set. Despite this, we find good AI-pathologist agreement on quantifying TPS compared to the interobserver agreement (mean reader-reader Cohen's kappa = 0.54, 95% CI 0.26–0.81, mean reader-AI kappa = 0.49, 95% CI 0.27—0.72). In conclusion, our deep learning algorithm demonstrates promise in detecting PD-L1 expression at a cellular level and exhibits favorable agreement with pathologists in quantifying the tumor proportion score (TPS). We publicly release our models for use via the Grand-Challenge platform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Scientific Reports is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder