دورية أكاديمية

Effect of training sample size, sampling design and prediction model on soil mapping with proximal sensing data for precision liming.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Effect of training sample size, sampling design and prediction model on soil mapping with proximal sensing data for precision liming.
المؤلفون: Schmidinger, Jonas, Schröter, Ingmar, Bönecke, Eric, Gebbers, Robin, Ruehlmann, Joerg, Kramer, Eckart, Mulder, Vera L., Heuvelink, Gerard B. M., Vogel, Sebastian
المصدر: Precision Agriculture; Jun2024, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p1529-1555, 27p
مصطلحات موضوعية: SOIL mapping, DIGITAL soil mapping, SAMPLE size (Statistics), LATIN hypercube sampling, PREDICTION models
مصطلحات جغرافية: GERMANY (East)
مستخلص: Site-specific estimation of lime requirement requires high-resolution maps of soil organic carbon (SOC), clay and pH. These maps can be generated with digital soil mapping models fitted on covariates observed by proximal soil sensors. However, the quality of the derived maps depends on the applied methodology. We assessed the effects of (i) training sample size (5–100); (ii) sampling design (simple random sampling (SRS), conditioned Latin hypercube sampling (cLHS) and k-means sampling (KM)); and (iii) prediction model (multiple linear regression (MLR) and random forest (RF)) on the prediction performance for the above mentioned three soil properties. The case study is based on conditional geostatistical simulations using 250 soil samples from a 51 ha field in Eastern Germany. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were used to evaluate model performances. Results show that with increasing training sample sizes, relative improvements of RMSE and CCC decreased exponentially. We found the lowest median RMSE values with 100 training observations i.e., 1.73%, 0.21% and 0.3 for clay, SOC and pH, respectively. However, already with a sample size of 10, models of moderate quality (CCC > 0.65) were obtained for all three soil properties. cLHS and KM performed significantly better than SRS. MLR showed lower median RMSE values than RF for SOC and pH for smaller sample sizes, but RF outperformed MLR if at least 25–30 or 75–100 soil samples were used for SOC or pH, respectively. For clay, the median RMSE was lower with RF, regardless of sample size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Precision Agriculture is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:13852256
DOI:10.1007/s11119-024-10122-3