دورية أكاديمية
Community consensus on core open science practices to monitor in biomedicine
| العنوان: | Community consensus on core open science practices to monitor in biomedicine |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Kelly D. Cobey, Stefanie Haustein, Jamie Brehaut, Ulrich Dirnagl, Delwen L. Franzen, Lars G. Hemkens, Justin Presseau, Nico Riedel, Daniel Strech, Juan Pablo Alperin, Rodrigo Costas, Emily S. Sena, Thed van Leeuwen, Clare L. Ardern, Isabel O. L. Bacellar, Nancy Camack, Marcos Britto Correa, Roberto Buccione, Maximiliano Sergio Cenci, Dean A. Fergusson, Cassandra Gould van Praag, Michael M. Hoffman, Renata Moraes Bielemann, Ugo Moschini, Mauro Paschetta, Valentina Pasquale, Valeria E. Rac, Dylan Roskams-Edris, Hermann M. Schatzl, Jo Anne Stratton, David Moher |
| المصدر: | PLoS Biology, Vol 21, Iss 1 (2023) |
| بيانات النشر: | Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2023. |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Biology (General) |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Biology (General), QH301-705.5 |
| الوصف: | The state of open science needs to be monitored to track changes over time and identify areas to create interventions to drive improvements. In order to monitor open science practices, they first need to be well defined and operationalized. To reach consensus on what open science practices to monitor at biomedical research institutions, we conducted a modified 3-round Delphi study. Participants were research administrators, researchers, specialists in dedicated open science roles, and librarians. In rounds 1 and 2, participants completed an online survey evaluating a set of potential open science practices, and for round 3, we hosted two half-day virtual meetings to discuss and vote on items that had not reached consensus. Ultimately, participants reached consensus on 19 open science practices. This core set of open science practices will form the foundation for institutional dashboards and may also be of value for the development of policy, education, and interventions. The state of open science needs to be monitored to track changes over time and identify areas to create interventions to drive improvements. This Consensus View identifies 19 open science practices that will form the foundation for institutional dashboards for monitoring progress. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1544-9173 1545-7885 |
| العلاقة: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873153/?tool=EBITest; https://doaj.org/toc/1544-9173Test; https://doaj.org/toc/1545-7885Test |
| الوصول الحر: | https://doaj.org/article/993bfe314fbb41688cd2180a045a98c7Test |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsdoj.993bfe314fbb41688cd2180a045a98c7 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 15449173 15457885 |
|---|