التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery: a feasibility study. |
| المؤلفون: |
Waterland, Jamie L., Ismail, Hilmy, Granger, Catherine L., Patrick, Cameron, Denehy, Linda, Riedel, Bernhard, on behalf of the Centre for Prehabilitation and Perioperative Care, Beaumont, Anna, Bruns, Emma, Burbury, Kate, Carty, Danika, Chahal, Rani, Christelis, Georgina, Coleman, Sonia, Crowe, Jessica, Edbrooke, Lara, Fairweather, Melanie, Ftanou, Maria, Graham, Kate, Hall, Travis |
| المصدر: |
Perioperative Medicine; 8/23/2022, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p1-13, 13p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
ABDOMINAL surgery, ONCOLOGIC surgery, EXERCISE tests, PREHABILITATION, ANAEROBIC threshold, BREATHING exercises |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
NEW Zealand |
| مستخلص: |
Background: Patients presenting for major surgery with low cardiorespiratory fitness (deconditioning) and other modifiable risk factors are at increased risk of postoperative complications. This study investigated the feasibility of delivering prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery. Methods: Eligible patients in this single-center cohort study included patients with poor fitness (objectively assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing, CPET) scheduled for elective major abdominal cancer surgery. Patients were recruited to participate in a prehabilitation program that spanned up to 6 weeks pre-operatively and comprised aerobic and resistance exercise training, breathing exercise, and nutritional support. The primary outcome assessed pre-specified feasibility targets: recruitment >70%, retention >85%, and intervention adherence >70%. Secondary outcomes were assessed for improved pre-operative functional status and health-related quality of life and for postoperative complications. Results: Eighty-two (34%) out of 238 patients screened between April 2018 and December 2019 were eligible for recruitment. Fifty (61%) patients (52% males) with a median age of 71 (IQR, 63–77) years participated in the study. Baseline oxygen consumption the at anaerobic threshold and at peak exercise (mean±SD: 9.8±1.8 and 14.0±2.9 mL/kg/min, respectively) confirmed the deconditioned state of the study cohort. The retention rate within the prehabilitation program was 84%, with 42 participants returning for repeat CPET testing. While >60% of participants preferred to do home-based prehabilitation, adherence to the intervention was low—with only 12 (28%) and 15 (35%) of patients having self-reported compliance >70% with their exercise prescriptions. Conclusion: Our prehabilitation program in high-risk cancer surgery patients did not achieve pre-specified targets for recruitment, retention, and self-reported program adherence. These findings underpin the importance of implementation research and strategies for the prehabilitation programs in major surgery. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000073909) retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Perioperative Medicine is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder