دورية أكاديمية

Real‐World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes Among First‐Line Sunitinib Patients with Clear Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) by the International mRCC Database Consortium Risk Group.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Real‐World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes Among First‐Line Sunitinib Patients with Clear Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) by the International mRCC Database Consortium Risk Group.
المؤلفون: Savard, Marie‐France, Wells, J. Connor, Graham, Jeffrey, Dudani, Shaan, Steinharter, John A., McGregor, Bradley A., Donskov, Frede, Bjarnason, Georg A., Vaishampayan, Ulka N., Hansen, Aaron R., Iafolla, Marco A.J., Zanotti, Giovanni, Huynh, Lynn, Chang, Rose, Duh, Mei S., Heng, Daniel Y.C.
المصدر: Oncologist; May2020, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p422-430, 9p, 3 Charts, 3 Graphs
مصطلحات موضوعية: ANTINEOPLASTIC agents, CANCER patients, CONFIDENCE intervals, METASTASIS, HEALTH outcome assessment, RENAL cell carcinoma, RISK assessment, SURVIVAL, TERMINATION of treatment, TREATMENT effectiveness, RETROSPECTIVE studies, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, KAPLAN-Meier estimator, EVALUATION
مستخلص: Background: International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups are important when considering therapeutic options for first‐line treatment. Materials and Methods: Adult patients with clear cell mRCC initiating first‐line sunitinib between 2010 and 2018 were included in this retrospective database study. Median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan‐Meier analysis. Outcomes were stratified by IMDC risk groups and evaluated for those in the combined intermediate and poor risk group and separately for those in the intermediate risk group with one versus two risk factors. Results: Among 1,769 patients treated with first‐line sunitinib, 318 (18%) had favorable, 1,031 (58%) had intermediate, and 420 (24%) had poor IMDC risk. Across the three risk groups, patients had similar age, gender, and sunitinib initiation year. Median TTD was 15.0, 8.5, and 4.2 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and 7.1 months in the combined intermediate and poor risk group. Median OS was 52.1, 31.5, and 9.8 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and 23.2 months in the combined intermediate and poor risk group. Median OS (35.1 vs. 21.9 months) and TTD (10.3 vs. 6.6 months) were significantly different between intermediate risk patients with one versus two risk factors. Conclusion: This real‐world study found a median OS of 52 months for patients with favorable IMDC risk treated with first‐line sunitinib, setting a new benchmark on clinical outcomes of clear cell mRCC. Analysis of intermediate risk group by one or two risk factors demonstrated distinct clinical outcomes. Implications for Practice: This analysis offers a contemporary benchmark for overall survival (median, 52.1 months; 95% confidence interval, 43.4–61.2) among patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with sunitinib as first‐line therapy in a real‐world setting and classified as favorable risk according to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group classification. This study demonstrates that clinical outcomes differ between IMDC risk groups as well as within the intermediate risk group based on the number of risk factors, thus warranting further consideration of risk group when counseling patients about therapeutic options and designing clinical trials. This article reports real‐world data on patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first‐line sunitinib to provide benchmarks on clinical outcomes by IMDC prognostic risk group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Oncologist is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:10837159
DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0605