دورية أكاديمية

DNA methylation-based classification of glioneuronal tumours synergises with histology and radiology to refine accurate molecular stratification.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: DNA methylation-based classification of glioneuronal tumours synergises with histology and radiology to refine accurate molecular stratification.
المؤلفون: Stone, Thomas J., Mankad, Kshitij, Tan, Ai Peng, Jan, Wajanat, Pickles, Jessica C., Gogou, Maria, Chalker, Jane, Slodkowska, Iwona, Pang, Emily, Kristiansen, Mark, Madhan, Gaganjit K., Forrest, Leysa, Hughes, Deborah, Koutroumanidou, Eleni, Mistry, Talisa, Ogunbiyi, Olumide, Ahmed, Saira W., Cross, J. Helen, Hubank, Mike, Hargrave, Darren
المصدر: Neuropathology & Applied Neurobiology; Apr2023, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p1-13, 13p
مصطلحات موضوعية: METHYLATION, HISTOLOGY, SUPPORT vector machines, TUMORS, RADIOLOGY, DNA
مستخلص: Aims: Glioneuronal tumours (GNTs) are poorly distinguished by their histology and lack robust diagnostic indicators. Previously, we showed that common GNTs comprise two molecularly distinct groups, correlating poorly with histology. To refine diagnosis, we constructed a methylation-based model for GNT classification, subsequently evaluating standards for molecular stratification by methylation, histology and radiology. Methods: We comprehensively analysed methylation, radiology and histology for 83 GNT samples: a training cohort of 49, previously classified into molecularly defined groups by genomic profiles, plus a validation cohort of 34. We identified histological and radiological correlates to molecular classification and constructed a methylation-based support vector machine (SVM) model for prediction. Subsequently, we contrasted methylation, radiological and histological classifications in validation GNTs. Results: By methylation clustering, all training and 23/34 validation GNTs segregated into two groups, the remaining 11 clustering alongside control cortex. Histological review identified prominent astrocytic/oligodendrocyte-like components, dysplastic neurons and a specific glioneuronal element as discriminators between groups. However, these were present in only a subset of tumours. Radiological review identified location, margin definition, enhancement and T2 FLAIR-rim sign as discriminators. When validation GNTs were classified by SVM, 22/23 classified correctly, comparing favourably against histology and radiology that resolved 17/22 and 15/21, respectively, where data were available for comparison. Conclusions: Diagnostic criteria inadequately reflect glioneuronal tumour biology, leaving a proportion unresolvable. In the largest cohort of molecularly defined glioneuronal tumours, we develop molecular, histological and radiological approaches for biologically meaningful classification and demonstrate almost all cases are resolvable, emphasising the importance of an integrated diagnostic approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Neuropathology & Applied Neurobiology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:03051846
DOI:10.1111/nan.12894