Background Seminal trials evaluating anti-CD20 therapy in progressive MS primarily found benefit in younger, less-disabled patients with more inflammatory disease activity. The risks and benefits of ocrelizumab use in older patients with progressive froms of MS are not known. Methods Retrospective chart review was performed for patients older than 55 with primary or secondary progressive MS at the time of ocrelizumab initiation. Clinical endpoints from 2 years prior to anti-CD20 therapy served as a within-subject control. Results Data was reviewed for 56 patients older than the age of 55 at the time of ocrelizumab initiation. Of 37 patients with 2-years of follow up on ocrelizumab, 40%(n=15) experienced confirmed disability progression (CDP) while 60% (n=22) remained stable or improved. 24 patients had data available for the within-subject control; for these patients, median age was 67, baseline EDSS 6.3, and disease duration 20.5 years. Prior to anti-CD20 therapy, 58% (n=14) of patients remained stable and 42% (n=10) experienced CDP. After ocrelizumab initiation, 71% (n=17) remained stable and 29% (n=7) experienced CDP. There was no difference between CDP (p=0.54) or change in EDSS (p=0.09) between time periods. Ocrelizumab was well tolerated and no difference in infection rate was seen using the within-subject control. Conclusions We found no difference in clinical endpoints for patients on ocrelizumab compared to prior to anti-CD20 therapy; however, we could not exclude a modest effect given our sample size. Larger trials are needed to evaluate ocrelizumab use in this understudied MS subpopulation.
