التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
CATAGORIES FOR ACCEPTABILITY OF LIES. |
| المؤلفون: |
Lindskold, Svenn1, Walters, Pamela S.1 |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Social Psychology. Jun1983, Vol. 120 Issue 1, p129. 8p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*QUESTIONNAIRES, FETAL presentation, SURVEYS, ETHICS, HUMANITIES, PHILOSOPHY |
| مستخلص: |
A total of 311 Ss in three studies responded to alternate forms of questionnaires in which evaluations were made of the reprehensibility of various types of lies. The Ss in Study 1 rated a variety of lies suggested in the ethical philosophy literature. From the results, six categories of lies were inferred. These categories were validated on two separate forms in Study 2 by having Ss rate the permissibility of lies described in vignettes which were created to operationalize the categories. The results on both forms were consistent with the predictions. In Study 3 Ss rated the category statements in the abstract—i.e., the E's definitions of the categories—precisely as predicted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Social Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Business Source Index |
