Measuring Local Public Health and Primary Care Collaboration: A Practice-Based Research Approach

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Measuring Local Public Health and Primary Care Collaboration: A Practice-Based Research Approach
المؤلفون: Betty Bekemeier, Rebekah Pratt, Kimberly Gearin, Donald E. Nease, Elizabeth Gyllstrom
المصدر: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 25:382-389
بيانات النشر: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: Washington, medicine.medical_specialty, Colorado, Minnesota, Sample (statistics), Population health, Funding Mechanism, 03 medical and health sciences, Wisconsin, 0302 clinical medicine, medicine, Humans, 030212 general & internal medicine, Cooperative Behavior, Reimbursement, Response rate (survey), Local Government, 030505 public health, Primary Health Care, business.industry, Health Policy, Public health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Public relations, Data sharing, Cross-Sectional Studies, Local government, Public Health, Business, 0305 other medical science
الوصف: Objective To describe the degree of public health and primary care collaboration at the local level and develop a model framework of collaboration, the Community Collaboration Health Model (CCHM). Design Mixed-methods, cross-sectional surveys, and semistructured, key informant interviews. Setting All local health jurisdictions in Colorado, Minnesota, Washington, and Wisconsin. Participants Leaders from each jurisdiction were identified to describe local collaboration. Eighty percent of local health directors completed our survey (n = 193), representing 80% of jurisdictions. The parallel primary care survey had a 31% response rate (n = 128), representing 50% of jurisdictions. Twenty pairs of local health directors and primary care leaders participated in key informant interviews. Main outcome measure(s) Thirty-seven percent of jurisdictions were classified as having strong foundational and energizing characteristics in the model. Ten percent displayed high energizing/low foundational characteristics, 11% had high foundational/low energizing characteristics, and 42% of jurisdictions were low on both. Results Respondents reported wide variation in relationship factors. They generally agreed that foundational characteristics were present in current working relationships but were less likely to agree that relationships had factors promoting sustainability or innovation. Conclusions Both sectors valued working together in principle, yet few did. Identifying shared priorities and achieving tangible benefits may be critical to realizing sustained relationships resulting in population health improvement. Our study reveals broad variation in experiences among local jurisdictions in our sample. Tools, such as the CCHM, and technical assistance may be helpful to support advancing collaboration. Dedicated funding, reimbursement redesign, improved data systems, and data sharing capability are key components of promoting collaboration. Yet, even in the absence of new reimbursement models or funding mechanisms, there are steps leaders can take to build and sustain their relationships. The self-assessment tool and the CCHM can identify opportunities for improving collaboration and link practitioners to strategies.
تدمد: 1078-4659
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a0a79083e6b81421e45d02488ed66211Test
https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000000809Test
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....a0a79083e6b81421e45d02488ed66211
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE