دورية أكاديمية
The experience of device failure after cochlear implantation
العنوان: | The experience of device failure after cochlear implantation |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Jeong Heon Kim, Yeonjoo Choi, Woo Seok Kang, Hong Ju Park, Joong Ho Ahn, Jong Woo Chung |
المصدر: | Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol 52, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2023) |
بيانات النشر: | BMC |
سنة النشر: | 2023 |
المجموعة: | Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | Cochlear implantation, Device failure, Prodromic symptoms, Reimplantation, Audiologic performance, Surgery, RD1-811 |
الوصف: | Background The present study describes the treatment of patients at a tertiary institution who experienced device failure after Cochlear Implantation (CI), as well as identifying prodromic symptoms that could assist in the timely identification and management of device failure. Study design Retrospective database review (January 2000–May 2017). Setting Single tertiary hospital. Methods Factors recorded included the etiology of hearing loss; age at first and revision CI surgeries; surgical information, including operation time and approach; electrical outcomes after implantation; device implanted; symptoms of device failure; history of head trauma; and audiologic outcomes as determined by categories of auditory performance (CAP). Results From January 2000 to May 2017, 1431 CIs were performed, with 27 (1.9%) undergoing revision surgeries due to device failure. The most common etiology of hearing loss was idiopathic (12/27), followed by cochlear hypoplasia (5/27). Mean age at initial CI was 11.8 (1–72) years, with 21 being pre-lingual and 6 being post-lingual. Of the total devices initially implanted, 80.5% were from Cochlear, 15.9% from MED-EL, and 3.5% from Advanced Bionics. The failure rates of these devices were 1.3%, 3.1%, and 10.0%, respectively. The most suggestive symptom of device failure was intermittent loss of signal. Mean CAP scores were 5.17 before reimplantation and 5.54 and 5.81 at 1- and 3-years, respectively, after reimplantation. Conclusion The most suggestive symptom preceding device failure was intermittent loss of signal. Patients who present with this symptom should undergo electrical examination for suspected device failure. Audiologic outcomes showed continuous development despite revision surgeries. |
نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 1916-0216 |
العلاقة: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00652-7Test; https://doaj.org/toc/1916-0216Test; https://doaj.org/article/d801535bb97042beb869e3bb24110d99Test |
DOI: | 10.1186/s40463-023-00652-7 |
الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00652-7Test https://doaj.org/article/d801535bb97042beb869e3bb24110d99Test |
رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.EABC4043 |
قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
تدمد: | 19160216 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1186/s40463-023-00652-7 |