Effectiveness of biceps tenodesis versus SLAP repair for surgical treatment of isolated SLAP lesions: A systemic review and meta-analysis
| العنوان: | Effectiveness of biceps tenodesis versus SLAP repair for surgical treatment of isolated SLAP lesions: A systemic review and meta-analysis |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Peng Shang, Min Li, Jinbo Sun, Atik Badshah Shaikh, Xiliang Shang |
| المصدر: | Journal of Orthopaedic Translation Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, Vol 16, Iss, Pp 23-32 (2019) |
| سنة النشر: | 2018 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | 0301 basic medicine, medicine.medical_specialty, Labral repair, lcsh:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system, Superior labrum anterior and posterior, Tenodesis, SLAP, superior labrum anterior and posterior, Biceps, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Patient satisfaction, UCLA, University of California at Los Angeles score, medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Anterior posterior, Surgical treatment, VAS, Visual Analogue Scale score, 030203 arthritis & rheumatology, ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Labrum, CMS, Coleman methodology score, business.industry, Surgery, Clinical trial, 030104 developmental biology, Meta-analysis, Inclusion and exclusion criteria, Original Article, lcsh:RC925-935, business, LOE, Level of evidence |
| الوصف: | Background: Type II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions could induce chronic shoulder pain and impaired movement. Current management of Type II SLAP lesions consists of two well-established surgical procedures: arthroscopic biceps tenodesis and SLAP repair. However, which technique is preferred over the other is still a controversy. Methods: We performed a systematic electronic database search on Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles equating superior labral repair with biceps tenodesis, which were reported before August 2017 which included the phrase “superior labral anterior posterior” or “SLAP.” The randomised controlled clinical trials that met our criteria were evaluated for quality of methodology. The results obtained were further analysed and correlated to present the benefits and drawbacks comparing the two SLAP repair surgical procedures. Result: Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified five articles (204 patients) that were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicate that prevalence of patients return to preinjury sports level and the patients satisfaction were found to be significantly better in tenodesis group than in the SLAP repair group (p 0.05). Conclusions: Both the surgical treatments, SLAP repair and the biceps tenodesis, are efficacious in pain alleviation and recovery of shoulder function. But, compared with SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis showed higher rate of patient satisfaction and return to preinjury sports participation. The translational potential of this article: Impart better understanding regarding discrepancies in the outcomes between biceps tenodesis and SLAP repair in treating patients with isolated Type II SLAP lesions. Keywords: Labral repair, Superior labrum anterior and posterior, Tenodesis |
| تدمد: | 2214-031X |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::4f560e756f0d52694fdf74806c005272Test https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30723678Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....4f560e756f0d52694fdf74806c005272 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 2214031X |
|---|