المؤلفون: Bakkensen, Jennifer B., Brady, Paula, Carusi, Daniela, Romanski, Phillip, Thomas, Ann M., Racowsky, Catherine

المصدر: Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics; Nov2019, Vol. 36 Issue 11, p2315-2324, 10p

مصطلحات موضوعية: FROZEN human embryos, BLASTOCYST, EMBRYO transfer, CHILDBIRTH, PREGNANCY, PREMATURE labor, MORPHOLOGY, HUMAN in vitro fertilization

مستخلص: Purpose: To assess the importance of each blastocyst morphological criteria with pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included blastocyst single embryo transfers (SET) performed between 1/2012–2/2018. Poisson regression was used to evaluate pregnancy outcomes following fresh and cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET) for association with blastocyst expansion, inner cell mass (ICM) quality, and trophectoderm (TE) quality. Among cycles resulting in live birth, associations with preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA), were evaluated using logistic regression. Results: A total of 1023 fresh and 1222 CET cycles were included, of which 465 (45.1%) fresh and 600 (48.5%) CET cycles resulted in singleton live birth. Clinical pregnancy rates increased with increasing expansion among fresh transfers (p for trend = 0.001) but not CET (p = 0.221), and with TE quality for both fresh and CET cycles (p = 0.005 and < 0.0001, respectively). Live birth rates increased with increasing expansion (fresh p = 0.005, CET p = 0.018) and TE quality (fresh p = 0.028, CET p = 0.023). ICM grade was not associated with pregnancy outcomes; however, higher ICM quality among CET cycles was associated with increased chance of preterm birth (p = 0.005). Conclusions: In blastocyst SET, blastocyst expansion and TE quality were each associated with clinical pregnancy and live birth. While higher ICM quality was associated with increased chance of preterm birth among CET, no other associations with perinatal outcomes were identified. Clinicians can be reassured that pregnancies from blastocysts with lower expansion, ICM, or TE qualities are not more likely to result in adverse perinatal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: Copyright of Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

المؤلفون: Simopoulou, M, Sfakianoudis, K, Tsioulou, P, Rapani, A, Maziotis, E, Giannelou, P, Grigoriadis, S, Pantou, A, Nikolettos, K, Vlahos, N, Pantos, K, Koutsilieris, M

المصدر: Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics; Jun2019, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p1049-1061, 13p

مصطلحات موضوعية: META-analysis, EMBRYO transfer, HUMAN embryo transfer, CHILDBIRTH, BIRTH rate, PREMATURE labor, PUBLICATION bias

مستخلص: Purpose: The present systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to uniquely bring to literature data supporting the true place of the alternative practice of day-4 embryo transfer (D4 ET) in an IVF laboratory, beyond the one-dimensional option of facilitating a highly demanding program. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the databases of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Library, resulting to six prospective along with nine retrospective cohort studies meeting eligibility criteria for inclusion. A comparison of D4 ET with day-2 (D2), day-3 (D3), and day-5 (D5) ET, respectively, was performed employing R statistics. Results: The sourced results indicate no statistically significant difference regarding clinical pregnancy rates, and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rates stemming from the comparison of D4 with D2, D4 with D3, and D4 with D5 ET, respectively. Additionally, no statistically significant difference could be established in respect to cancelation, and miscarriage rates, following the comparison of D4 with D3 and D4 with D5 ET. Interestingly, we report statistically significant lower preterm birth rates associated with D4 ET, in contrast with D5 ET (RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05–0.67; p value = 0.01). Conclusions: The aforementioned results may serve as advocates buttressing the option of D4 ET as a valid candidate in the ET decision-making process. Possible limitations of the current study are the publication bias stemming from the retrospective nature of certain included studies, along with various deviations among studies' design, referring to number and quality of transferred embryos, or different culture conditions referring to studies of previous decades. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: Copyright of Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

المؤلفون: Amrane, S., Brown, M. B., Lobo, R. A., Luke, B.

المصدر: Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics; Sep2018, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p1595-1602, 8p

مصطلحات موضوعية: HUMAN in vitro fertilization, INFERTILITY, CHILDBIRTH, PREMATURE labor, MATERNAL age, DIAGNOSIS

مستخلص: Purpose: To evaluate factors associated with interpregnancy interval (IPI) among women treated with in vitro fertilization (IVF).Methods: Women with at least two cycles of IVF between 2004 and 2013 were identified from the SART CORS database and grouped by age at first cycle, infertility diagnosis, IVF treatment parameters, and cycle 1 outcome (singleton or multiple live birth or no live birth, length of gestation, and birthweight). The distributions of IPIs (in months, 0-5, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23, and ≥ 24) were compared across these factors. IPI was fit as a function of these factors by a general linear model, separately for singleton and multiple live births and no live births at cycle 1.Results: The study included 93,546 women with two consecutive IVF cycles where the first cycle resulted in a clinical intrauterine pregnancy or a live birth. Among women with a live birth in cycle 1, there was a general pattern of longer IPI for younger women compared to older women. Women with a multiple birth waited longer before initiating a second cycle than women with a singleton birth. For women with no live birth in the first cycle, nearly three fourths initiated cycle 2 within 6 months, regardless of their age. Short (0-5 months) IPI was associated with preterm delivery, older maternal age, and use of donor oocytes.Conclusions: Age of the mother, outcome of the first pregnancy, and treatment factors affect the length of the interpregnancy interval. Because short IPI has been associated with poor outcomes, women who are at risk for short IPI should be counseled about these outcome risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: Copyright of Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)