Association of left bundle branch block with left ventricular structure and function in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Association of left bundle branch block with left ventricular structure and function in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study
المؤلفون: Li, Z. B., Wachtell, K., Okin, P. M., Gerdts, E., Liu, J. E., Nieminen, M. S., Jern, Sverker, 1954, Dahlöf, Björn, 1953, Devereux, R. B.
المصدر: J Hum Hypertens. 18(6):397-402
مصطلحات موضوعية: MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP, Aged, 80 and over, Bundle-Branch Block/*etiology, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Ventricles/ultrasonography, Humans, Hypertension/*complications/ultrasonography, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/*complications/ultrasonography, Male, Middle Aged, Systole/physiology, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/*complications/ultrasonography
الوصف: Electrocardiographic (ECG) left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), but its relation to left ventricular (LV) geometry and function in hypertensive patients with ECG LVH is unknown. Echocardiograms were performed in 933 patients (548 women, mean age 66+/-7 years) with essential hypertension and LVH by baseline ECG in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. LBBB, defined by Minnesota code 7.1, was present in 47 patients and absent in 886 patients. Patients with and without LBBB were similar in age, gender, body mass index, blood pressure, prevalence of diabetes, and history of myocardial infarction. Despite similarly elevated mean LV mass (126+/-25 vs 124+/-26 g/m(2)) and relative wall thickness (0.41+/-0.07 vs 0.41+/-0.07, P=NS), patients with LBBB had lower LV fractional shortening (30+/-6 vs 34+/-6%), ejection fraction (56+/-10 vs 61+/-8%), midwall shortening (14+/-2 vs 16+/-2%), stress-corrected midwall shortening (90+/-13 vs 97+/-13%) (all P<0.001), and lower LV stroke index (38+/-7 vs 42+/-9 ml/m(2)) (P<0.05). Patients with LBBB also had reduced LV inferior wall and lower mitral E/A ratio (0.75+/-0.18 vs 0.87+/-0.38) (all P<0.05). The above univariate results were confirmed by multivariate analyses adjusted for gender, age, blood pressures, height, weight, body mass index, heart rate, and LV mass index. Among hypertensive patients at high risk because of ECG LVH, the presence of LBBB identifies individuals with worse global and regional LV systolic function and impaired LV relaxation without more severe LVH by echocardiography.
الوصول الحر: https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/56083Test
قاعدة البيانات: SwePub