Functional outcome in subretinal electronic implants depends on foveal eccentricity

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Functional outcome in subretinal electronic implants depends on foveal eccentricity
المؤلفون: Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Eberhart Zrenner, Florian Gekeler, Akos Kusnyerik, Katarina Stingl, Helmut G. Sachs
المصدر: Investigative ophthalmologyvisual science. 54(12)
سنة النشر: 2013
مصطلحات موضوعية: Retinal degeneration, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Fovea Centralis, Visual acuity, genetic structures, Neuroprosthetics, Motion Perception, Visual Acuity, Pilot Projects, Blindness, chemistry.chemical_compound, Foveal, Ophthalmology, Retinitis pigmentosa, Medicine, Humans, Retina, business.industry, Vision Tests, Retinal Degeneration, Retinal, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Electrodes, Implanted, Visual Prosthesis, medicine.anatomical_structure, Treatment Outcome, chemistry, Visual Perception, Female, Implant, medicine.symptom, business
الوصف: Purpose An active microelectronic subretinal implant, developed to replace the photoreceptive function in hereditary degenerations of the outer retina, has been applied in a pilot and clinical study in patients with end-stage retinal degeneration. Methods The study population comprised 20 blind patients, all of whom lost vision as result of a hereditary retinal disease. An active visual implant was placed surgically within the subretinal space of each patient: subfoveal placement in eight patients (group 1) and parafoveal placement in 12 (group 2). Standardized low-vision tests, including light perception, light localization, movement detection, grating acuity, and visual acuity by Landolt C-rings, were used under masked, randomized implant-OFF and implant-ON conditions. For the chip-mediated vision functional results of both subject groups were compared. Results Three of 20 patients were excluded from analysis because of surgical or technical implant issues. Among patients with nonfoveal placement of the implant, 80% could perceive light, 10% recognized location, and 10% correctly distinguished stripe patterns up to a resolution of 0.33 cycles/degree. No nonfoveal placement patient passed the motion or Landolt C-ring tests. When the implant was placed subfoveally, 100% of patients could perceive light and determine light localization, 75% could resolve motion up to 35°/s, 88% correctly distinguished stripe patterns up to a resolution of 3.3 cycles/degree, and 38% passed a Landolt C-ring test with a decimal visual acuity of up to 20/546 (logMAR 1.43). Conclusions Subfoveal placement of active subretinal visual implants allows superior measurable outcomes compared to para- or nonfoveal placement locations. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01024803, NCT00515814.).
تدمد: 1552-5783
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c48125a5d24ec2db1732274fce430c9fTest
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24150759Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....c48125a5d24ec2db1732274fce430c9f
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE