Bonnichsen v. United States: Time, Place, and the Search for Identity

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Bonnichsen v. United States: Time, Place, and the Search for Identity
المؤلفون: Sarah K. Harding
المصدر: International Journal of Cultural Property. 12:249-263
بيانات النشر: Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2005.
سنة النشر: 2005
مصطلحات موضوعية: Cultural Studies, Ninth, History, Cultural identity, Aside, Administrative law, media_common.quotation_subject, Interpretation (philosophy), Museology, Legislature, Conservation, Sovereignty, Anthropology, Law, Political science, Identity (philosophy), media_common
الوصف: On its surface, Bonnichsen v. United States is an administrative law case, reviewing a decision by the Secretary of the Interior regarding the appropriate reach of a specific set of legislative and regulatory rules. As such, Judge Gould, writing for a panel of the Ninth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) decided that the secretary's office had overstepped its bounds; in short, its interpretation of the rules in question was not reasonable. But underneath the legal categories, Bonnichsen is a much more complicated and politically charged case. It is about competing conceptions of history and spirituality. It is about sovereignty (although that word is not uttered once in the decision, aside from reciting a definition of Native Hawaiians) and the clash of cultures. It is less about the standards for decision making and more about who the appropriate decision makers are. It is a case about a man who lived 9,000 years ago and about how today we should understand his cultural identity.
تدمد: 1465-7317
0940-7391
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::66f7ae47a48d9e6d600230ab19c7a58dTest
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0940739105050149Test
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi...........66f7ae47a48d9e6d600230ab19c7a58d
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE