دورية أكاديمية

Vitamin D recommendations in clinical guidelines: A systematic review, quality evaluation and analysis of potential predictors.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Vitamin D recommendations in clinical guidelines: A systematic review, quality evaluation and analysis of potential predictors.
المؤلفون: Fraile Navarro, David, López García‐Franco, Alberto, Niño de Guzmán, Ena, Rabassa, Montserrat, Zamanillo Campos, Rocío, Pardo‐Hernández, Héctor, Ricci‐Cabello, Ignacio, Canelo‐Aybar, Carlos, Meneses‐Echavez, Jose F., Yepes‐Nuñez, Juan José, Kuindersma, Jesse, Gich Saladich, Ignasi, Alonso‐Coello, Pablo
المصدر: International Journal of Clinical Practice; Nov2021, Vol. 75 Issue 11, p1-21, 21p
مستخلص: Background: Vitamin D has been widely promoted for bone health through supplementation and fortification of the general adult population. However, there is growing evidence that does not support these strategies. Our aim is to review the quality and recommendations on vitamin D nutritional and clinical practice guidelines and to explore predictive factors for their direction and strength. Methods: We searched three databases and two guideline repositories from 2010 onwards. We performed a descriptive analysis, a quality appraisal using AGREE II scores (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation) and a bivariate analysis evaluating the association between direction and strength of recommendations, AGREE II domains' scores and pre‐specified characteristics. Results: We included 34 guidelines, 44.1% recommended, 26.5% suggested and 29.4% did not recommend vitamin D supplementation. Guidelines that scored higher for "editorial independence" and "overall quality score" were less likely to recommend or suggest vitamin D supplementation (median 68.8 vs 35.4; P =.001 and 58.3 vs 37.5; P =.02). Guidance produced by government organisations and those that reported source of funding were associated with higher AGREE II scores. Unclear role of source of funding was associated with recommending or suggesting vitamin D supplementation (P =.034). Editorial independence was an independent predictor for recommending or suggesting vitamin D supplementation (OR 1.09; CI95% 1.02 to 1.16; P =.006). Conclusions: Policymakers, clinicians and patients should be aware that lower quality guidelines and those reporting conflicts of interest are more likely to promote vitamin D supplementation. Guideline organisations should improve the quality of their recommendations' development and the management of conflicts of interest. Users and editors should be aware of these findings when using and appraising guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Clinical Practice is the property of Hindawi Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:13685031
DOI:10.1111/ijcp.14805