Fluoroscopy-guided vs. navigated iliosacral screw placement with intraoperative 3D scan or postoperative CT control: Impact of the clinical workflow on patients' radiation exposure: Radiation exposure of different workflows for iliosacral screw placement

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Fluoroscopy-guided vs. navigated iliosacral screw placement with intraoperative 3D scan or postoperative CT control: Impact of the clinical workflow on patients' radiation exposure: Radiation exposure of different workflows for iliosacral screw placement
المؤلفون: Hannes, Kuttner, Emanuel, Benninger, Valentin, Fretz, Christoph, Meier
المصدر: Injury. 53(11)
سنة النشر: 2022
مصطلحات موضوعية: Cross-Sectional Studies, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Fluoroscopy, Bone Screws, Humans, Oxides, Radiation Exposure, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Workflow
الوصف: To guide iliosacral screws (ISS) and verify safe placement different techniques, e.g. Fluoroscopy-guided (FSG) or 3D navigation are known. However, higher radiation exposure for the conventional technique is a concern. It was the aim of this experimental study to evaluate radiation exposure for three clinical workflows.An anthropomorphic, cross sectional dosimetry phantom was equipped with metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors to measure organ specific radiation exposure. The effective dose was calculated. Radiation exposure was measured for FSG placement of 2 transverse ISS based on clinical experience regarding fluoroscopy time (240s). Additional measurements were conducted to calculate the effective dose for an intraoperative 3D scan as used for navigated ISS (high-quality 3D), for intraoperative verification of proper guide wire placement (standard-quality 3D) and for postoperative CT, using three different protocols. The following workflows were compared: FSG including postoperative CT (FSG-CT, including 3 different protocols) vs. FSG with intraoperative 3D scan in standard quality (FSG-3D) vs. navigation including two intraoperative 3D scan for navigated ISS (NAV-3D).The effective dose for FSG-CT ranged from 4.41 mSv to 5.27 mSv. FSG-3D resulted in a total of 4.93 mSv. For NAV-3D, the effective dose was the lowest (3.00 mSv). The effective dose of a high-quality 3D scan required for navigation was 1.94 mSv, compared to 1.06 mSv for a standard-quality 3D scan as used for control.Intraoperative 3D scanning may be recommended, either combined with prior FSG ISS placement or following 3D navigation without increasing radiation exposure compared with alternative workflows with postoperative CT control.
تدمد: 1879-0267
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=pmid________::f9434db29f7d6780ab66ca7e3ae949a2Test
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36150911Test
رقم الانضمام: edsair.pmid..........f9434db29f7d6780ab66ca7e3ae949a2
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE