A sleeper, or more generally a “bearer”, moves vertically under a passing train load. The extent of this motion depends on the static and dynamic load of the train, the train speed, and the support conditions at the bearer and its neighbours. Excessive motion, typically from voiding see-sawing, low support stiffness or possibly excessive stiffness, or even too little stiffness, are all of interest to maintainers. Typically, problems arise around transition zones, switches and crossings, but plain track with poor support can also be a problem. Within the last decade, low-cost micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) accelerometers have been used to capture the time history of vertical motion for use in condition monitoring. Existing condition monitoring systems often overlook or sometimes even ignore the possibility of problematic data, which seem to be common in monitored locations. It is essential to understand whether such “bad” data require further attention. Three problematic sites are presented, focussing on examples where the acceleration was higher than expected or the computed displacement was not as expected. Potential causes include wheel defects, hammering of the ballast by a hanging bearer, or high acceleration at some structural resonant frequency. The present paper aims to show the challenges of using MEMS accelerometers to collect data for condition monitoring and offers insights into the sort of problematic data that may be collected from real sites.
Full Text Finder