دورية أكاديمية

Analyzing Argumentation In Rich, Natural Contexts

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Analyzing Argumentation In Rich, Natural Contexts
المؤلفون: Anita Reznitskaya, Richard C. Anderson
المصدر: Informal Logic, Vol 26, Iss 2, Pp 175-198 (2008)
بيانات النشر: University of Windsor, 2008.
سنة النشر: 2008
المجموعة: LCC:Logic
مصطلحات موضوعية: argumentation, discourse analysis, argument schema, cognitive processes, psychological theory, social learning, performance-based assessment, measurement, research methodology, mixed methods, computer applications, technology, idea unit, elementary school, Logic, BC1-199
الوصف: The paper presents the theoretical and methodological aspects of research on the development of argument- ation in elementary school children. It presents a theoretical framework detailing psychological mechanisms responsible for the acquisition and transfer of argumentative discourse and demonstrates several applications of the framework, described in sufficient detail to guide future empirical investigations of oral, written, individual, or group argumentation performance. Software programs capable of facilitating data analysis are identified and their uses illustrated. The analytic schemes can be used to analyze large amounts of verbal data with reasonable precision and efficiency. The conclusion addresses more generally the challenges for and possibilities of empirical study of the development of argumentation.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0824-2577
العلاقة: https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/442Test; https://doaj.org/toc/0824-2577Test
DOI: 10.22329/il.v26i2.442
الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/0f8ed7b013f64ae0871279b9a5c7534eTest
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.0f8ed7b013f64ae0871279b9a5c7534e
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:08242577
DOI:10.22329/il.v26i2.442