Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents for the Reduction of Coronary Restenosis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents for the Reduction of Coronary Restenosis
المؤلفون: Doreen McBride, Stefan N. Willich, Christoph Bode, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Christian W. Hamm, Bernd Brüggenjürgen
المصدر: Herz Kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen. 32:650-655
بيانات النشر: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2007.
سنة النشر: 2007
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Risk Assessment, Coronary Restenosis, Coronary artery disease, Restenosis, Risk Factors, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, cardiovascular diseases, Myocardial infarction, Sirolimus, business.industry, Incidence, Angiography, Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Stent, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Surgery, Stenosis, Treatment Outcome, surgical procedures, operative, Bypass surgery, Delayed-Action Preparations, Conventional PCI, Cardiology, Female, Stents, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business, Immunosuppressive Agents
الوصف: The GERSHWIN study (German Stent Health Outcome and Economics Within Normal Practice) was designed to evaluate long-term effects of treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), as compared to bare-metal stents (BMS). Within a multicenter, prospective intervention study in 35 hospitals throughout Germany, CAD patients with coronary stenosis and elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) indication were treated either with SES or BMS (sequential control design with a case-to-control ratio of 2 : 1). Standardized questionnaires were completed by patients and their physicians at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months following PCI to document re-PCI for restenosis, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary bypass surgery (CABG), and death. Angiographic PCI documentation was evaluated by an independent expert. From April 2003 until June 2005, 658 patients were treated with SES (mean age 63 ± 9 years, 87% male) and 294 patients with BMS (mean age 64 ± 10 years, 79% male). Significant baseline differences were found by age, gender, household status, threevessel disease, and number of implanted stents. After 18 months, 8% of the SES versus 17% of the BMS group had undergone target vessel revascularization (p adjusted < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between BMS and SES regarding MI, CABG, or death. Re-PCI of target and new non-target vessel lesions was performed at a significantly lower degree of stenosis in SES than in BMS. Compared to patients with BMS, patients with implantation of SES experienced considerably fewer target vessel revascularizations. The threshold to perform re-PCI appeared lower in SES than in BMS. An extended evaluation of the effects of SES will be available from the 3-year follow-up of the GERSHWIN study.
تدمد: 1615-6692
0340-9937
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::f3c0cd9ea5162ab3f54e9a0cbf2897cdTest
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-007-3048-2Test
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....f3c0cd9ea5162ab3f54e9a0cbf2897cd
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE