دورية أكاديمية
Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation before Veno-Venous ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Covid-19 related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The experience of a tertiary care center
العنوان: | Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation before Veno-Venous ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Covid-19 related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The experience of a tertiary care center |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Charles Vidal, Mathilde Nativel, Bérénice Puech, Florent Poirson, Radj Cally, Laurence Dangers, Eric Braunberger, Julien Jabot, Nicolas Allou, Jérôme Allyn |
المصدر: | Heliyon, Vol 10, Iss 11, Pp e31811- (2024) |
بيانات النشر: | Elsevier, 2024. |
سنة النشر: | 2024 |
المجموعة: | LCC:Science (General) LCC:Social sciences (General) |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | VV-ECMO, Covid-19, ARDS, Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, Science (General), Q1-390, Social sciences (General), H1-99 |
الوصف: | Background: Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is an efficient ventilatory support in patients with refractory Covid-19-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), however the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) before ECMO initiation as a contraindication is still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of prolonged IMV prior to VV-ECMO in patients suffering from refractory Covid-19-related ARDS. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all patients treated with VV-ECMO for refractory Covid-19-related ARDS between January 1, 2020 and May 31, 2022. The impact of IMV duration was investigated by comparing patients on VV-ECMO during the 7 days (and 10 days) following IMV with those assisted after 7 days (and 10 days). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Results: Sixty-four patients were hospitalized in the ICU for Covid-19-related refractory ARDS requiring VV-ECMO. Global in-hospital mortality was 55 %. Median duration of IMV was 4 [2; 8] days before VV-ECMO initiation. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between patients assisted with IMV pre-VV-ECMO for a duration of ≤7 days (≤10 days) and those assisted after 7 days (and 10 days) ((p = 0.59 and p = 0.45). Conclusion: This study suggests that patients assisted with VV-ECMO after prolonged IMV had the same prognosis than those assisted earlier in refractory Covid-19-related ARDS. Therefore, prolonged mechanical ventilation of more than 7–10 days should not contraindicate VV-ECMO support. An individual approach is necessary to balance the risks and benefits of ECMO in this population. |
نوع الوثيقة: | article |
وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 2405-8440 |
العلاقة: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024078423Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2405-8440Test |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31811 |
الوصول الحر: | https://doaj.org/article/2966b94221f84dd39236c30074bb75f4Test |
رقم الانضمام: | edsdoj.2966b94221f84dd39236c30074bb75f4 |
قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
تدمد: | 24058440 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31811 |