Méthodes de maturation cervicale et déclenchement du travail : évaluation de la sonde simple ballonnet comparée à la sonde double ballonnet et aux prostaglandines

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Méthodes de maturation cervicale et déclenchement du travail : évaluation de la sonde simple ballonnet comparée à la sonde double ballonnet et aux prostaglandines
المؤلفون: Philippe Deruelle, E. Clouqueur, V. Pez, Maeva Kyheng, C. Boyon, Charles Garabedian
المصدر: Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie. 46:570-574
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine, business.industry, Vaginal delivery, Cephalic presentation, medicine.medical_treatment, Bishop score, Balloon catheter, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dinoprostone, Surgery, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, medicine.anatomical_structure, Reproductive Medicine, Labor induction, medicine, Caesarean section, 030212 general & internal medicine, business, Cervix
الوصف: Objective To compare the effectiveness of single balloon catheter with double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert for cervical ripening and labor induction on unfavourable cervix. Methods this is a comparative, retrospective, one-center trial. Were included singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation. Were excluded cicatricial uterus. The outcomes were vaginal delivery rate, caesarean section rate, modification in Bishop score, time from induction to delivery, second time prostaglandin E2 resort, oxytocin administration resort, maternal or neonatal adverse events. Results Were included 108 patients: 45 in single balloon catheter group, 32 in double balloon catheter group, 31 in dinoprostone insert group. Vaginal delivery rate was similar in single balloon catheter group (78 %) compared with others groups (75 % in double balloon catheter and 71 % in dinoprostone insert group respectively). Oxytocin administration resort was superior in single balloon catheter group. There was no significant difference on others outcomes. Labor induction costs were 9euros in single balloon catheter group, versus 55 and 81 euros in double balloon catheter group and dinoprostone insert group respectively. Conclusions Single balloon catheter seems just as effective as double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert with its major asset the low cost for labor induction.
تدمد: 2468-7189
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::08c2d375cc789f18e1dce263672802e9Test
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2018.05.009Test
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi...........08c2d375cc789f18e1dce263672802e9
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE