دورية أكاديمية

Management of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Haploidentical Transplant: Multicenter Experience From the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Management of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Haploidentical Transplant: Multicenter Experience From the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant
المؤلفون: Bailén, Rebeca, Vicario, José Luis, Solán, Laura, Sánchez-Vadillo, Irene, Herrera, Pilar, Calbacho, María, Alenda, Raquel, López-Lorenzo, José Luis, Humala, Karem, Chinea, Anabelle, Sánchez-Pina, José, Balas, Antonio, Moreno, Miguel Ángel, Arzuaga, Javier, Pradillo, Virginia, Dorado, Nieves, Oarbeascoa, Gillen, Anguita, Javier, Díez-Martín, José Luis, Kwon, Mi
المصدر: Frontiers in Immunology ; volume 12 ; ISSN 1664-3224
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media SA
سنة النشر: 2021
المجموعة: Frontiers (Publisher - via CrossRef)
الوصف: Background Donor specific antibodies (DSAs) can be responsible for graft failure (GF) in the setting of mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of our study is to report the experience of the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GMTH) in patients with DSAs undergoing haplo-HSCT. Methods Patients undergoing haplo-HSCT in centers from the GMTH from 2012 to 2020 were included in the study. DSAs were analyzed with a solid-phase single-antigen immunoassay; monitoring was performed during desensitization on days -14, -7, 0 and in a weekly basis until neutrophil engraftment. Desensitization strategies varied depending on center experience, immunofluorescence intensity, complement fixation and type of antibodies. Results We identified a total of 20 haplo-HSCT in 19 patients performed with DSAs in 5 centers. 10 (53%) patients presented anti-HLA class I DSAs (6 of them with > 5000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)), 4 (21%) presented anti-HLA class II (1 with > 5000 MFI) and 5 (26%) presented both anti-HLA class I and II (5 with > 5000 MFI). 90% of patients received at least two treatments as desensitization strategy and all experienced a decrease of MFI after desensitization (mean reduction 74%). Only one patient who developed progressive increase of MFI after infusion developed GF. Desensitization treatments used included rituximab, immunoglobulins, therapeutic plasma exchange, incompatible platelets, buffy coat and immunosuppressors. Seventeen (90%) patients achieved neutrophil engraftment; one patient died before engraftment because of infection and one patient with class I DSAs developed primary GF despite an intensive desensitization. After a median follow-up of 10 months, OS and EFS were 60% and 58%, respectively, cumulative incidence of relapse was 5% and NRM was 32%. Conclusions Despite the optimal strategy of DSAs desensitization remains unclear, the use of desensitization treatment guided by DSAs intensity kinetics constitute an effective approach with high ...
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: unknown
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.674658
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.674658/full
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.674658Test
حقوق: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Test/
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.86FD6D3C
قاعدة البيانات: BASE