دورية أكاديمية

Diagnostic Accuracy of Female Pelvic Ultrasonography in Differentiating Precocious Puberty From Premature Thelarche: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Diagnostic Accuracy of Female Pelvic Ultrasonography in Differentiating Precocious Puberty From Premature Thelarche: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
المؤلفون: Nam Nhat Nguyen, Linh Ba Phuong Huynh, Minh Duc Do, Tien Yun Yang, Meng-Che Tsai, Yang-Ching Chen
المصدر: Frontiers in Endocrinology, Vol 12 (2021)
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media S.A., 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology
مصطلحات موضوعية: precocious puberty, premature thelarche, pelvic ultrasonography, uterine length, diagnostic accuracy, Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology, RC648-665
الوصف: BackgroundThe gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test is the benchmark for diagnosing precocious puberty (PP). However, it is invasive, time-consuming, costly, and may create an unpleasant experience for participants. Moreover, some overlaps may occur between PP and premature thelarche (PT) in the early stage of PP. Female pelvic ultrasonography may provide additional information to help differentiate PP from PT and subsequently initiate early treatment. In this study, we aimed to first directly compare pelvic ultrasonography parameters between PP and PT groups and secondly, investigate their diagnostic accuracy compared with the GnRH stimulation test.MethodsA systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed up to March 31, 2021. All types of studies, except for case reports and review articles, were included. The GnRH stimulation test was used to confirm PP diagnosis. Those whose organic conditions might cause PP were excluded. The mean, standard deviation, sensitivity, and specificity of each parameter were documented. Forest plots were constructed to display the estimated standardized mean differences (SMDs) from each included study and the overall calculations. A bivariate model was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR).ResultsA total of 13 studies were included for analysis. The SMDs (95% confidence interval – CI) in ovarian volume, fundal-cervical ratio, uterine length, uterine cross-sectional area, and uterine volume between PP and PT groups were 1.12 (0.78–1.45; p < 0.01), 0.90 (0.07–1.73; p = 0.03), 1.38 (0.99–1.78; p < 0.01), 1.06 (0.61–1.50; p < 0.01), and 1.21 (0.84–1.58; p
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1664-2392
العلاقة: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.735875/fullTest; https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392Test
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.735875
الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/2259b99b33ca44beacb5e26449680b78Test
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.2259b99b33ca44beacb5e26449680b78
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:16642392
DOI:10.3389/fendo.2021.735875