Pre-admission antiplatelet therapy and treatment effect of ticagrelor vs. prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes-a subgroup analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Pre-admission antiplatelet therapy and treatment effect of ticagrelor vs. prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes-a subgroup analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial
المؤلفون: Shqipdona Lahu, Gjin Ndrepepa, Franz-Josef Neumann, Maurizio Menichelli, Isabell Bernlochner, Gert Richardt, Jochen Wöhrle, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Rayyan Hemetsberger, Katharina Mayer, Ibrahim Akin, Salvatore Cassese, Senta Gewalt, Erion Xhepa, Sebastian Kufner, Christian Valina, Hendrik B Sager, Michael Joner, Tareq Ibrahim, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Heribert Schunkert, Stefanie Schüpke, Adnan Kastrati
المصدر: European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy. 8(7)
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Ticagrelor, Aspirin, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Hemorrhage, cardiovascular diseases, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Prasugrel Hydrochloride, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Clopidogrel
الوصف: Aims To assess whether the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs. prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) are influenced by pre-admission treatment with aspirin and/or clopidogrel. Methods and results Patients (n = 4018) were categorized into two groups: pre-admission aspirin and/or clopidogrel group (n = 1455) and no pre-admission aspirin or clopidogrel group (n = 2563). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; the secondary safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3–5 bleeding, both at 1 year. Patients in the pre-admission aspirin and/or clopidogrel group had a higher risk of ischaemic events, but a similar risk of bleeding to patients in the no pre-admission aspirin or clopidogrel group (cumulative incidences 10.5% vs. 6.7%, and 5.7% vs. 5.7%, respectively). The primary endpoint occurred in 81/717 patients assigned to ticagrelor and 69/738 patients assigned to prasugrel in the pre-admission aspirin and/or clopidogrel group [11.5% vs. 9.5%; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.69], and in 103/1295 patients assigned to ticagrelor and 68/1268 patients assigned to prasugrel in the no pre-admission aspirin or clopidogrel group [8.0% vs. 5.4%; HR = 1.50 (1.10–2.03); Pint = 0.38]. BARC type 3–5 bleeding events did not differ between ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients in the pre-admission aspirin and/or clopidogrel (6.2% vs. 4.5%) or no pre-admission aspirin or clopidogrel (5.3% vs. 5.1%) group (Pint = 0.54). Conclusion In patients with ACS, pre-admission therapy with aspirin and/or clopidogrel has no influence on the relative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel.
تدمد: 2055-6845
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::85cc2b916d67822a4d8abecd676f9cc0Test
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35191982Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....85cc2b916d67822a4d8abecd676f9cc0
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE