دورية أكاديمية

Are granulocyte colony-stimulating factors beneficial in treating diabetic foot infections?: A meta-analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Are granulocyte colony-stimulating factors beneficial in treating diabetic foot infections?: A meta-analysis.
المؤلفون: Cruciani M (AUTHOR), Lipsky BA (AUTHOR), Mengoli C (AUTHOR), de Lalla F (AUTHOR), Cruciani, Mario1 (AUTHOR), Lipsky, Benjamin A (AUTHOR), Mengoli, Carlo (AUTHOR), de Lalla, Fausto (AUTHOR)
المصدر: Diabetes Care. Feb2005, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p454-460. 7p.
مستخلص: Objective: To assess the value of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot infections.Research Design and Methods: We systematically searched the medical literature (including Medline, Embase, LookSmart, and the Cochrane Library) for prospective randomized studies that used G-CSF as an adjunct to standard treatment for diabetic foot infections. Using a conventional meta-analysis, we pooled the relative risks (RRs) for outcomes of interest, including resolution of infection, wound healing, duration of antibiotic therapy, and need for various surgical interventions, using a fixed-effects model.Results: Five randomized trials, with a total of 167 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was satisfactory. The investigators administered various G-CSF preparations parenterally for between 3 and 21 days. The meta-analysis revealed that adding G-CSF did not significantly affect the resolution of infection or the healing of the wounds but was associated with a significantly reduced likelihood of lower extremity surgical interventions (RR 0.38 [95% CI 0.20-0.69], number of patients who needed to be treated: 4.5), including amputation (0.41 [0.17-0.95], number of patients who needed to be treated: 8.6). There was no evidence of heterogeneity among the studies or of publication bias, suggesting that these conclusions are reasonably generalizable and robust.Conclusions: Adjunctive G-CSF treatment does not appear to hasten the clinical resolution of diabetic foot infection or ulceration but is associated with a reduced rate of amputation and other surgical procedures. The small number of patients who needed to be treated to gain these benefits suggests that using G-CSF should be considered, especially in patients with limb-threatening infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
قاعدة البيانات: Academic Search Index
الوصف
تدمد:01495992
DOI:10.2337/diacare.28.2.454