دورية أكاديمية

Prostate cancer screening: guidelines review and laboratory issues.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Prostate cancer screening: guidelines review and laboratory issues.
المؤلفون: Filella, Xavier, Albaladejo, María Dolores, Allué, Juan Antonio, Castaño, Miguel Angel, Morell-Garcia, Daniel, Ruiz, Maria Àngels, Santamaría, María, Torrejón, María José, Giménez, Nuria
المصدر: Clinical Chemistry & Laboratory Medicine; Oct2019, Vol. 57 Issue 10, p1474-1487, 14p, 1 Diagram, 4 Charts
مصطلحات موضوعية: EARLY detection of cancer, LABORATORIES, PROSTATE cancer, PROSTATE-specific antigen, GUIDELINES
الشركة/الكيان: WORLD Health Organization
مستخلص: Background: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remains as the most used biomarker in the detection of early prostate cancer (PCa). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are produced to facilitate incorporation of evidence into clinical practice. This is particularly useful when PCa screening remains controversial and guidelines diverge among different medical institutions, although opportunistic screening is not recommended. Methods: We performed a systematic review of guidelines about PCa screening using PSA. Guidelines published since 2008 were included in this study. The most updated version of these CPGs was used for the evaluation. Results: Twenty-two guidelines were selected for review. In 59% of these guidelines, recommendations were graded according to level of evidence (n = 13), but only 18% of the guidelines provided clear algorithms (n = 4). Each CPG was assessed using a checklist of laboratory issues, including pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical factors. We found that laboratory medicine specialists participate in 9% of the guidelines reviewed (n = 2) and laboratory issues were frequently omitted. We remarked that information concerning the consequences of World Health Organization (WHO) standard in PSA testing was considered by only two of 22 CPGs evaluated in this study. Conclusions: We concluded that the quality of PCa early detection guidelines could be improved properly considering the laboratory issues in their development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Clinical Chemistry & Laboratory Medicine is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:14346621
DOI:10.1515/cclm-2018-1252