Cytogenetic analysis is considered pivotal for assessing the remission rate in CML patients on IFN therapy. On the basis of general agreement, at least 25 metaphases should be analyzed in each case. The main limitations to this approach are: 1) the small number of analyzable metaphases generally found in cytogenetic preparations from IFN-α-treated patients; and 2) the inability of this technique for scoring interphase cells. We compared the results of cytogenetic analysis and double-color FISH detection of bcr/abl genes fusion in 13 CML patients on IFN-α therapy (marrow sampling for cytogenetic and FISH analysis was carried out after 12 months in all patients and repeated after 18 months of IFN therapy in patients 4, 6, and 8). In five specimens, 20 to 25 cells were evaluable for cytogenetic examination, in another five no analyzable metaphases were scored, and in the remaining six samples two to 14 cells could be analyzed. With FISH detection at least 100 cells were easily scored in each specimen (mean number, 175). Comparing the results carried out with the two methods in different samples it emerged that cytogenetic analysis led to improper conclusions as regards the rate of Ph positivity, even in those patients where 20–25 metaphases were analyzed. Although many more cases have to be studied to establish the role of FISH analysis in Ph-positive patients, we are of the opinion that cytogenetic analysis is unfit for easily and accurately assessing the actual quality of remission in IFN-treated subjects.
