التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
The Canadian Frailty Priority Setting Partnership: Research Priorities for Older Adults Living with Frailty. |
| المؤلفون: |
Bethell, Jennifer, Puts, Martine T. E., Sattar, Schroder, Andrew, Melissa K., Choate, Andrew S., Clarke, Barry, Cowan, Katherine, DeAngelis, Carlo, Elliott, Jacobi, Fitch, Margaret I., Frank, Chris, Hominick, Kathryn, Keatings, Margaret, McElhaney, Janet E., McKay, Sandra M., Pitters, Eric, Ploeg, Jenny, Sidani, Souraya, McGilton, Katherine S. |
| المصدر: |
Canadian Geriatrics Journal; Mar2019, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p23-33, 11p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
FRAIL elderly, INTERPROFESSIONAL relations, MEDICAL research, PROFESSIONAL associations, QUESTIONNAIRES, SURVEYS, ADULT education workshops, SOCIAL support, OLD age |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
ONTARIO |
| مستخلص: |
Background Patient engagement in research priority-setting is intended to democratize research and increase impact. The objectives of the Canadian Frailty Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) were to engage people with lived or clinical experience of frailty, and produce a list of research priorities related to care, support, and treatment of older adults living with frailty. Methods The Canadian Frailty PSP was supported by the Canadian Frailty Network, coordinated by researchers in Toronto, Ontario and followed the methods of the James Lind Alliance, which included establishing a Steering Group, inviting partner organizations, gathering questions related to care, support and treatment of older adults living with frailty, processing the data and prioritizing the questions. Results In the initial survey, 799 submissions were provided by 389 individuals and groups. The 647 questions that were within scope were categorized, merged, and summarized, then checked against research evidence, creating a list of 41 unanswered questions. Prioritization took place in two stages: first, 146 individuals and groups participated in survey and their responses short-listed 22 questions; and second, an in-person workshop was held on September 26, 2017 in Toronto, Ontario where these 22 questions were discussed and ranked. Conclusion Researchers and research funders can use these results to inform their agendas for research on frailty. Strategies are needed for involving those with lived experience of frailty in research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Canadian Geriatrics Journal is the property of Canadian Geriatrics Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder