دورية أكاديمية

The protective effect of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices on endothelial cell loss during cataract surgery: a meta-analysis using mixed treatment comparisons.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The protective effect of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices on endothelial cell loss during cataract surgery: a meta-analysis using mixed treatment comparisons.
المؤلفون: Van den Bruel, Ann, Gailly, Jeannine, Devriese, Stephan, Welton, Nicky J., Shortt, Alex J., Vrijens, France
المصدر: British Journal of Ophthalmology; Jan2011, Vol. 95 Issue 1, p5-10, 6p, 3 Diagrams, 4 Charts
مصطلحات موضوعية: VISCOELASTIC materials, EYE protection, CATARACT surgery, META-analysis, OPHTHALMOLOGY
مستخلص: Background/Aims To compare ophthalmic viscoelastic devices (OVDs) in protecting the cornea from endothelial cell loss during cataract surgery. Methods A systematic review yielded 21 randomised controlled trials including 1769 patients. OVDs were classified according to the Arshinoff classification. Traditional pairwise meta-analyses were performed for each direct comparison. Mixed treatments comparisons (MTC) analysis was also performed to combine all direct and indirect comparisons. The outcome measure was loss in endothelial cell density 3 months after surgery. Results Direct comparison meta-analysis showed that viscoadaptives lead to a lower loss in cell density compared with very low viscosity dispersives, and compared with super viscous cohesives. The soft shell technique, a combination of viscous cohesives and medium viscosity dispersives, showed a lower loss compared with viscous cohesives, but was not compared with the other treatments. The MTC analysis shows that comparing all treatment options together, all mean differences were ≤100 cells/mm2. The probability of being the best treatment option is 80% for viscoadaptives and 18% for the soft shell technique. Conclusion Viscoadaptives may be superior to the other OVDs, but absolute differences in loss in endothelial cell density are <100 cells/mm2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Ophthalmology is the property of BMJ Publishing Group and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:00071161
DOI:10.1136/bjo.2009.158360