Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening
المؤلفون: Linda N. Douma, Ellen Uiters, Danielle R. M. Timmermans
المساهمون: Public and occupational health, CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life, APH - Quality of Care, APH - Personalized Medicine
المصدر: BMC Psychology, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020)
Douma, L N, Uiters, E & Timmermans, D R M 2020, ' Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening ', BMC Psychology, vol. 8, no. 1, 11 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-0381-1Test
BMC Psychology, 8(1):11. BioMed Central
BMC Psychology
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, Decision Making, Population, lcsh:BF1-990, Health literacy, Context (language use), Decisional conflict, CRC screening, Social group, Cancer screening, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Mass Screening, 030212 general & internal medicine, education, Early Detection of Cancer, General Psychology, Aged, Response rate (survey), education.field_of_study, 030503 health policy & services, Psychological research, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Colorectal cancer, lcsh:Psychology, Female, Decision-making styles, Colorectal Neoplasms, 0305 other medical science, Psychology, Research Article, Clinical psychology, Decision-making
الوصف: Background Our study examined the use of decision-making styles, as identified by Scott and Bruce (1995) (i.e. differentiating between a rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant and spontaneous decision-making style), within the context of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation. In the field of cancer screening, informed decision-making is considered important, which follows the Rational Decision model. Subsequently, gaining more insight into decision-making styles being used in real life, could improve support to people when making their screening decision. In addition, we examined whether the decision-making style that people used was associated with their experienced decisional conflict. Methods An online survey was carried out among a sample of first-time CRC screening invitees (1282 respondents, response rate 49%). We assessed people’s decision-making styles, CRC screening participation, education level, self-reported health literacy, and decisional conflict, and examined the possible associations between them. Results In our study, people who had to decide about CRC screening scored high on using both a rational and intuitive decision-making style. Respondents scoring higher on using a spontaneous or dependent decision-making style were more likely to have participated in CRC screening, while respondents scoring higher on using an avoidant decision-making style were more likely not to have participated in CRC screening. However, differences were small. Generally, people in our study experienced low decisional conflict. Conclusion Our eligible CRC screening population scored high on using both a rational and intuitive decision-making style. To optimise support to people, public education materials could be appealing more to the intuitive processes at hand. That being said, the current education materials aimed at informed/rational decision-making do not necessarily seem to create a problem, as people generally experienced low decisional conflict. Possible concerns regarding the use of a spontaneous, dependent or avoidant decision-making style could be that these styles might be contributing to less informed decisions. However, it is relevant to consider that the found differences are small and that any possible concern applies to a relatively small group of people.
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2050-7283
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e26b43d3d0e32824f93c9a18982b69c2Test
https://doaj.org/article/6e79e3d32c6849fe8ee67445286dde64Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....e26b43d3d0e32824f93c9a18982b69c2
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE