دورية أكاديمية

Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus
المؤلفون: Yiwen Pan, Yu Feng, Weifeng Peng, Yang Cai, Jing Ding, Xin Wang
المصدر: BMC Neurology, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2022)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
مصطلحات موضوعية: Status epilepticus, Seizure duration, Mortality, Seizure recurrence, Functional status, Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system, RC346-429
الوصف: Abstract Background In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new conceptual definition of status epilepticus (SE) with two operational dimensions (t1 and t2) to guide emergency treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients at these two different time points. Methods We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive adults diagnosed with SE. In case of convulsive SE, t1 is 5 min and t2 is 30 min, whereas in case of focal SE with impaired consciousness, t1 is 10 min, t2 is 60 min. Data on clinical characteristics, including age, gender, history of prior seizures, neuroimaging, semiology, duration, and etiology of SE, were collected. The primary outcome was mortality, with seizure recurrence as a secondary measure, and functional status as tertiary outcome of enrolled patients at 3 months after SE onset. Results We screened one hundred patients with SE, with a median age of 66 years and 61% were male. Fifty-six (56.0%) patients reached t1 of SE, while 44 (44.0%) reached t2 of SE. Convulsive SE (52.0%, n = 52) was more common than focal SE with impaired consciousness (48.0%, n = 48). Status epilepticus secondary to an acute symptomatic process was the most common (50%, n = 50). Patients meeting t2 of SE demonstrated a remarkably increased risk of mortality (unadjusted analysis-RR 3.606, 95%CI 1.552–8.376, p = 0.003; adjusted analysis-RR 2.924, 95%CI 1.221–7.003, p = 0.016) and unfavorable functional status (unadjusted analysis-RR 1.803, 95%CI 1.280–2.539, p = 0.001; adjusted analysis-RR 1.664, 95%CI 1.184–2.340, p = 0.003) at 3 months compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Patients reaching t2 of SE were more likely to experience seizure recurrence, however, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts. Conclusions Our study provides strong support for the new definition of SE. Patients meeting t2 of SE tend to have a remarkably increased risk of mortality and unfavorable functional outcomes compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Furthermore, patients were likely to experience seizure recurrence after undergoing an episode of SE. Physicians must be educated about prompt recognition and appropriate management of SE.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1471-2377
العلاقة: https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2377Test
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y
الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/5968bba6e416405fb58aea3637b6f761Test
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.5968bba6e416405fb58aea3637b6f761
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14712377
DOI:10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y