التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Preoperative frailty and outcome in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. |
| المؤلفون: |
Vlies, Ellen, Los, Maartje, Stijns, Pascal E.F., Hengel, Marike, Blaauw, Nynke M.S., Bos, Willem Jan W., Dongen, Eric P.A., Melick, Harm H.E., Noordzij, Peter G. |
| المصدر: |
BJU International; Sep2020, Vol. 126 Issue 3, p388-395, 8p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
CYSTECTOMY, LOGISTIC regression analysis, PATIENT selection, SURGICAL complications, ODDS ratio |
| الشركة/الكيان: |
AMERICAN Society of Anesthesiologists |
| مستخلص: |
Objective: To determine the value of preoperative frailty screening in predicting postoperative severe complications and 1‐year mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). Patients and Methods: Prospective cohort single‐centre study in patients undergoing RC from September 2016 to December 2017. Preoperative frailty screening was implemented as standard care and was used to guide shared decision‐making during multidisciplinary team meetings. Frailty screening consisted of validated tools to assess physical, mental and social frailty. Patients were considered frail when having two or more frailty characteristics. The primary endpoint was the composite of a severe complication (Clavien–Dindo Grade III–V) within 30 days and 1‐year all‐cause mortality. The secondary endpoints included any complication (Clavien–Dindo II–V), length of stay, readmission within 30 days, and all‐cause mortality. Logistic regression analysis and the concordance statistic (c‐statistic) were used to describe the association and predictive value of preoperative frailty screening. Results: A total of 63 patients were included; 39 (61.9%) were considered frail. Preoperative frailty was associated with a seven‐fold increased risk of a severe complication or death 1 year after RC [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 7.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–31.8; 22 patients]. Compared to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and Charlson Comorbidity Index, frailty showed the best model performance (Nagelkerke R2 0.20) and discriminative ability(c‐statistic 0.72, P < 0.01) for the primary endpoint. After adding frailty to the conventional ASA risk score, the c‐statistic improved by 11% (P < 0.01). Overall survival was significantly worse in frail patients (23.2 months, 95% CI 18.7–30.1) vs non‐frail patients (32.9 months, 95% CI 30.0–35.9; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Frail patients undergoing RC are at high risk of postoperative adverse outcomes including death. Preoperative frailty screening improves preoperative risk stratification and may be used to guide patient selection for RC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of BJU International is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder