دورية أكاديمية

Cost‐Effectiveness of Community‐Based Diet and Exercise for Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis and Obesity or Overweight

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Cost‐Effectiveness of Community‐Based Diet and Exercise for Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis and Obesity or Overweight
المؤلفون: Kopp, Paul T., Yang, Catherine, Yang, Heidi, Katz, Jeffrey N., Paltiel, A. David, Hunter, David J., Callahan, Leigh F., Mihalko, Shannon L., Newman, Jovita J., DeVita, Paul, Loeser, Richard F., Miller, Gary D., Messier, Stephen P., Losina, Elena
المساهمون: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
المصدر: Arthritis Care & Research ; ISSN 2151-464X 2151-4658
بيانات النشر: Wiley
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: Wiley Online Library (Open Access Articles via Crossref)
الوصف: Objective Obesity exacerbates pain and functional limitation in persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA). In the Weight Loss and Exercise for Communities with Arthritis in North Carolina (WE‐CAN) study, a community‐based diet and exercise (D + E) intervention led to an additional 6 kg weight loss and 20% greater pain relief in persons with knee OA and body mass index (BMI) >27 kg/m 2 relative to a group‐based health education (HE) intervention. We sought to determine the incremental cost‐effectiveness of the usual care (UC), UC + HE, and UC + (D + E) programs, comparing each strategy with the “next‐best” strategy ranked by increasing lifetime cost. Methods We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model to project long‐term clinical and economic benefits of the WE‐CAN interventions. We considered three strategies: UC, UC + HE, and UC + (D + E). We derived cohort characteristics, weight, and pain reduction from the WE‐CAN trial. Our outcomes included quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs), cost, and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results In a cohort with mean age 65 years, BMI 37 kg/m 2 , and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score 38 (scale 0–100, 100 = worst), UC leads to 9.36 QALYs/person, compared with 9.44 QALYs for UC + HE and 9.49 QALYS for UC + (D + E). The corresponding lifetime costs are $147,102, $148,139, and $151,478. From the societal perspective, UC + HE leads to an ICER of $12,700/QALY; adding D + E to UC leads to an ICER of $61,700/QALY. Conclusion The community‐based D + E program for persons with knee OA and BMI >27kg/m 2 could be cost‐effective for willingness‐to‐pay thresholds greater than $62,000/QALY. These findings suggest that incorporation of community‐based D + E programs into OA care may be beneficial for public health. image
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1002/acr.25323
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25323Test
حقوق: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vorTest
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.58F3B7A5
قاعدة البيانات: BASE