Infections en rythmologie interventionnelle

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Infections en rythmologie interventionnelle
المؤلفون: Salem Younsi, C. Raimondo, L. Fiorina, F. Salerno, V. Manenti, Jérôme Lacotte, Pascale Chemaly, M. Ait Said, J. Horvilleur
المصدر: Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie. 69:404-410
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.drug_class, business.industry, Risk of infection, medicine.medical_treatment, Antibiotics, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, medicine.disease, Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, Asepsis, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Antibiotic resistance, medicine, Endocarditis, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Medical prescription, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Intensive care medicine, business
الوصف: The implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators carries the highest risk of infection in interventional electrophysiology. The use of implantable cardiac devices is continually increasing with almost 2 million devices implanted worldwide each year. The recipients' profile may also be associated with an increased risk of infection. Several measures can be implemented to reduce the risk of device-related infection. Systematic antibiotic prophylaxis has proven to be beneficial provided that prescription modalities are respected, especially with respect to the selection of the appropriate molecule and timing of administration prior to the procedure. Despite all the precautions taken during surgery (asepsis, prophylactic antibiotic therapy….) the estimated rate of peri-procedural infection is around 2%. Device related infections are associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality as well as substantial healthcare costs. Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and epidermidis (SE) are the pathogenic agents involved in most cases. Prevention is crucial given the difficulties in treating such infections because of the near-systematic need to remove the device and antibiotic resistance. Leadless pacemakers and subcutaneous defibrillators are potential alternatives to implantable endocardial devices, albeit with certain limitations. A group of experts has recently issued consensus paper on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infections associated with endocardial implantable cardiac devices.
تدمد: 0003-3928
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::bf829bca0c34b0a0ec2b3504165207cbTest
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancard.2020.09.033Test
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi...........bf829bca0c34b0a0ec2b3504165207cb
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE