A systematic review of reporting quality for anaesthetic interventions in randomised controlled trials
| العنوان: | A systematic review of reporting quality for anaesthetic interventions in randomised controlled trials |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | L. Elliott, Keng Siang Lee, Natalie S Blencowe, Robert J. Hinchliffe, Mahim I Qureshi, Ronelle Mouton, Karen D Coulman |
| المصدر: | Elliott, L, Coulman, K D, Blencowe, N S, Qureshi, M I, Lee, K S, Hinchliffe, R J & Mouton, R 2020, ' A systematic review of reporting quality for anaesthetic interventions in randomised controlled trials ', Anaesthesia . https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15294Test Anaesthesia |
| بيانات النشر: | Wiley, 2020. |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Research Report, medicine.medical_specialty, reporting standards, Psychological intervention, standardisation, Context (language use), Review Article, randomised controlled trials, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 030202 anesthesiology, Intervention (counseling), medicine, Humans, Anesthesia, adherence, 030212 general & internal medicine, Review Articles, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Protocol (science), business.industry, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, protocols and guidelines, Physical therapy, business |
| الوصف: | Summary Interventions from randomised controlled trials can only be replicated if they are reported in sufficient detail. The results of trials can only be confidently interpreted if the delivery of the intervention was systematic and the protocol adhered to. We systematically reviewed trials of anaesthetic interventions published in 12 journals from January 2016 to September 2019. We assessed the detail with which interventions were reported, using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non‐pharmacological treatments. We analysed 162 interventions reported by 78 trials in 18,675 participants. Detail sufficiently precise to replicate the intervention was reported for 111 (69%) interventions. Intervention standardisation was reported for 135 (83%) out of the 162 interventions, and protocol adherence was reported for 20 (12%) interventions. Sixty (77%) out of the 78 trials reported the administrative context in which interventions were delivered and 36 (46%) trials detailed the expertise of the practitioners. We conclude that bespoke reporting tools should be developed for anaesthetic interventions and interventions in other areas such as critical care. |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| تدمد: | 1365-2044 0003-2409 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::26fe50a882377992b8bff1d79bac7915Test https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15294Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....26fe50a882377992b8bff1d79bac7915 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 13652044 00032409 |
|---|