يعرض 1 - 6 نتائج من 6 نتيجة بحث عن '"moralidad"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.76s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
  2. 2
    دورية أكاديمية

    المساهمون: Instituto de História Contemporânea (IHC), RUN

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    العلاقة: 1130-2402; PURE: 89447272

  3. 3
    دورية أكاديمية
  4. 4
    دورية أكاديمية
  5. 5
    دورية أكاديمية

    المساهمون: Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Viseu

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    العلاقة: Madalena Cunha e Jéssica Figueiredo e Joana Breia e João Pina e Sónia Almeida e Tiago Oliveira e Maria Cunha}, title = {Fundaments of the ethical acting in higher education students}, journal = {Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health}, volume = {0}, number = {1}, year = {2016}, keywords = {ethical principles; morality; acing; higher educaion; students}, abstract = {Introducion: It is urgent that higher educaion in health develop a proacive ethico-moral commitment in students which is translated into the creaion of socio-professional values. Objecives: To evaluate the ethical foundaions which support morality in higher educaion students. Methods: A descripive, cross-sithecional study, performed in 345 ESSV/IPV students, 80% female, average age of 20.82 years old. The “Quesionário de Cidadania Aiva e Modo de Agir Éico” (CiAMAE) by Cunha (2015) was applied.Results: The results were 74.8% of the students showed a posiive/adequate ethical method of acing; (with 45.8% adequate and 29% very adequate). In 25.2% the method of acing was ethically inadequate. The morality of the student’s acions were focused mostly on individualism and were based on the following ethical principles: 68.7% ethical subjecivism (69.1%♂ and 68.6%♀); 56.5% Relaivism ( 56.5%♂ and 56.7%♀); 53.9% Deontological Ethics (kant) (55.8%♂ and 47.0%♀); 11.3% Subjecivism/Ethical Selishness (7.4%♂ and 12.3%♀).Conclusions: We may infer that the majority of the students do not have/ do not use an imparial consideraion of good as criteria for morality of acions. They mostly manifested acceping an ethical subjecivist perspecive, which means that good is not considered as a value for everyone. In contrast, applying the criteria of ethical impariality would imply considering the greater good, and choosing/adoping the universal point of view in which any raional and enlightened student would choose for him/ herself and for others that universal greater good.}, issn = {1647-662X}, pages = {143--155} url = {http://revistas.rcaap.pt/millenium/article/view/10397Test}}

  6. 6