التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Benchmark problems for transcranial ultrasound simulation: Intercomparison of compressional wave modelsa). |
| المؤلفون: |
Aubry, Jean-Francois, Bates, Oscar, Boehm, Christian, Butts Pauly, Kim, Christensen, Douglas, Cueto, Carlos, Gélat, Pierre, Guasch, Lluis, Jaros, Jiri, Jing, Yun, Jones, Rebecca, Li, Ningrui, Marty, Patrick, Montanaro, Hazael, Neufeld, Esra, Pichardo, Samuel, Pinton, Gianmarco, Pulkkinen, Aki, Stanziola, Antonio, Thielscher, Axel |
| المصدر: |
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; Aug2022, Vol. 152 Issue 2, p1003-1019, 17p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
LONGITUDINAL waves, BENCHMARK problems (Computer science), FINITE difference time domain method, MEDIAN (Mathematics), ULTRASONIC imaging, TRANSCRANIAL direct current stimulation, ACOUSTIC wave propagation, TRANSCRANIAL Doppler ultrasonography |
| مستخلص: |
Computational models of acoustic wave propagation are frequently used in transcranial ultrasound therapy, for example, to calculate the intracranial pressure field or to calculate phase delays to correct for skull distortions. To allow intercomparison between the different modeling tools and techniques used by the community, an international working group was convened to formulate a set of numerical benchmarks. Here, these benchmarks are presented, along with intercomparison results. Nine different benchmarks of increasing geometric complexity are defined. These include a single-layer planar bone immersed in water, a multi-layer bone, and a whole skull. Two transducer configurations are considered (a focused bowl and a plane piston operating at 500 kHz), giving a total of 18 permutations of the benchmarks. Eleven different modeling tools are used to compute the benchmark results. The models span a wide range of numerical techniques, including the finite-difference time-domain method, angular spectrum method, pseudospectral method, boundary-element method, and spectral-element method. Good agreement is found between the models, particularly for the position, size, and magnitude of the acoustic focus within the skull. When comparing results for each model with every other model in a cross-comparison, the median values for each benchmark for the difference in focal pressure and position are less than 10% and 1 mm, respectively. The benchmark definitions, model results, and intercomparison codes are freely available to facilitate further comparisons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of the Acoustical Society of America is the property of American Institute of Physics and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
