دورية أكاديمية

What's happening in quality improvement at the local hospital: a state-wide study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: What's happening in quality improvement at the local hospital: a state-wide study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.
المؤلفون: Holmboe, Eric S., Meehan, Thomas P., Radford, Martha J., Wang, Yun, Krumholz, Harlan M., Holmboe, E S, Meehan, T P, Radford, M J, Wang, Y, Krumholz, H M
المصدر: American Journal of Medical Quality; May/Jun2000, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p106-113, 8p
مصطلحات موضوعية: MYOCARDIAL infarction-related mortality, MYOCARDIAL infarction treatment, COMPARATIVE studies, HOSPITALS, RESEARCH methodology, MEDICAL cooperation, ORGANIZATIONAL change, PROFESSIONAL standards review organizations (Medicine), QUALITY assurance, RESEARCH, RESEARCH funding, EVALUATION research, EVALUATION of human services programs
مصطلحات جغرافية: CONNECTICUT
مستخلص: The objective of this study was to investigate what happened to improve the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at all 32 nonfederal hospitals in Connecticut and to assess the impact of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP) on quality improvement (QI) activities for AMI. We performed a questionnaire study with secondary analyses using the CCP database. On-site interviews were conducted with QI directors at all 32 Connecticut nonfederal hospitals that participated in the Health Care Financing Administration's Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP) in 1992-93 and 1995. The interviews sought information about the makeup of QI departments, specific approaches used to improve the care of patients with AMI, and the perceived value of the CCP to each individual hospital. Results showed that the number of full-time equivalents (FTEs) and FTEs per beds employed in QI departments ranged from 1 to 30 and from 0.4 to 7.9, respectively, with a registered nurse most often serving as the department head (27/32). Over half of the departments (17/32) had additional responsibilities. The majority (25/32) used some combination of physician champions, multidisciplinary QI teams, standing orders, or critical pathways to effect change in AMI care. Finally, 26 of the 32 hospitals believed the CCP was valuable because it provided credible benchmark data, a catalyst for change, or a specific focus on processes of care needing improvement in AMI. Despite great variability in institutional resources, all 32 hospitals used a similar combination of QI approaches to effect change in AMI care. However, there is variable scientific evidence supporting these approaches. Externally sponsored projects such as the CCP appear to play a useful role for individual hospitals. Defining the optimal methods of QI is difficult given that hospitals are using complex combinations of nonstandardized improvement interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Medical Quality is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:10628606
DOI:10.1177/106286060001500304