المؤلفون: Zhang, Wenchao¹ zhangwenchao@aoe.ac.cn, Wei, Dongyan¹ weidy@aircas.ac.cn, Yuan, Hong¹ yuanhong@aircas.ac.cn, Yang, Guang¹ yangguang@aircas.ac.cn

المصدر: IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation & Measurement. 2021, Vol. 70, p1-14. 14p.

مصطلحات موضوعية: CONSTRAINT algorithms, PEDESTRIANS, FOOT

مستخلص: The inertial-based pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) system assisted by zero-velocity update (ZUPT) algorithm has been widely researched, as it can independently provide effective pedestrian’s position in indoor environment. However, in the realistic test, the system still often suffers from drift, due to the ZUPT algorithm’s poor observation of system’s heading. In this article, based on full analysis of the existing maximum range constraint algorithm between both-side feet, first, a constraint method based on the maximum distance of one-side foot has been proposed. It mainly uses the principle that the distance between the position of one-side foot at current time and that of the previous stationary instant should be within a maximum range. Second, a one-side foot and both-side feet cooperative maximum range constraint algorithm has been proposed. It mainly uses the one-side foot maximum range and the both-side feet maximum range to intersect the most likely position of pedestrian’s current moving foot and then uses this position to constrain the heading divergence. Finally, to further improve the heading constraint accuracy, a maximum range decoupling algorithm has been proposed, which decouples the maximum ranges of one-side foot and both-side feet into the distance in the forward direction. Then, using this distance, the heading divergence can be constrained more effectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: Copyright of IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation & Measurement is the property of IEEE and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

المؤلفون: Wang, Zhiyu^1,2 (AUTHOR), Wang, Liang¹ (AUTHOR) wangliang@aircas.ac.cn, Li, Zishen^1,3 (AUTHOR), Hoque, Mainul² (AUTHOR), Wang, Ningbo¹ (AUTHOR), Wei, Dongyan¹ (AUTHOR), Yuan, Hong¹ (AUTHOR)

المصدر: IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation (Wiley-Blackwell). Aug2023, Vol. 17 Issue 8, p1213-1229. 17p.

مصطلحات موضوعية: ORBIT determination, ORBITS of artificial satellites, GLOBAL Positioning System, ORBITS (Astronomy), ARTIFICIAL satellites in navigation

مستخلص: The code multipath error associated with elevation in BDS‐2 is one of the main factors whose impact on the precision of real‐time reduced‐dynamic precise orbit determination (POD) using spaceborne multi‐global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) observation data for FengYun‐3C (FY‐3C) and FengYun‐3D (FY‐3D) satellites. The aim is to construct a code multipath piece‐wise linear error model and analyse the contribution of BDS‐2 to the performance of low earth orbit POD. Conclusions are drawn out from the experimental results: (1) the real‐time POD average precision of FY‐3C and FY‐3D is improved by about 11% and 12% after the correction of BDS‐2 code multipath error; (2) Due to the small number of available BDS‐2 satellites and the limited accuracy of geostationary earth orbit (GEO) satellite real‐time orbit products, the precision of the real‐time overlapping comparison for FY‐3C/FY‐3D by using the BDS‐2 onboard observation data can only reach the decimetre level. However, with the BDS‐2 signal capture capability of the FY‐3D onboard GNSS Occultation Sounder upgraded, the average precision of the BDS‐2‐based POD for FY‐3D is better than that of FY‐3C in each direction and with 10% improvement in the average 3 dimensional‐root mean square (3D‐RMS); (3) Cases of onboard global positioning system (GPS), GPS + BDS‐2 (with GEO), and GPS + BDS‐2 (without GEO) for real‐time POD can meet 5–8 cm precision requirement. The average 3D‐RMS of the real‐time POD for FY‐3C/FY‐3D, which utilises onboard GPS + BDS‐2 data is inferior only to GPS data, owing to the influence of the orbit accuracy of GEO satellites. However, after excluding the influence of GEO satellites, the average result (3D‐RMS) of the real‐time POD for FY‐3C (6.11 cm) and FY‐3D (5.95 cm) is better than those of other cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: Copyright of IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation (Wiley-Blackwell) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)