التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Evaluation of the Polarimetric-Radar Quantitative Precipitation Estimates of an Extremely Heavy Rainfall Event and Nine Common Rainfall Events in Guangzhou. |
| المؤلفون: |
Yang Zhang1,2 zhangyang_cams@163.com, Liping Liu1,2 liulp@cma.gov.cn, Hao Wen3 haowenfly@163.com, Chong Wu2 wuchong89@foxmail.com, Yonghua Zhang4,5 zhangyh@grmc.gov.cn |
| المصدر: |
Atmosphere. Sep2018, Vol. 9 Issue 9, p330. 22p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*RAINFALL, *METEOROLOGICAL precipitation, *DROP size distribution, *RADAR meteorology, *MICROPHYSICS |
| مستخلص: |
The development and application of operational polarimetric radar (PR) in China is still in its infancy. In this study, an operational PR quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) algorithm is suggested based on data for PR hydrometeor classification and local drop size distribution (DSD). Even though this algorithm performs well for conventional rainfall events, in which hourly rainfall accumulations are less than 50 mm, the capability of a PR to estimate extremely heavy rainfall remains unclear. The proposed algorithm is used for nine different types of rainfall events that occurred in Guangzhou, China, in 2016 and for an extremely heavy rainfall event that occurred in Guangzhou on 6 May 2017. It performs well for all data of these nine rainfall events and for light-to-moderate rain (hourly accumulation <50 mm) in this extremely heavy rainfall event. However, it severely underestimated heavy rain (>50 mm) and the extremely heavy rain at stations where total rainfall exceeded 300 mm within 5 h in this extremely heavy rainfall event. To analyze the reasons for underestimation, a rain microphysics retrieval algorithm is presented to retrieve Dm and Nw from the PR measurements. The DSD characteristics and the factors affecting QPE are analyzed based on Dm and Nw. The results indicate that compared with statistical DSD data in Yangjiang (estimators are derived from these data), the average raindrop diameter during this rainfall event occurred on 6 May 2017 was much smaller and the number concentration was higher. The algorithm underestimated the precipitation with small and midsize particles, but overestimated the precipitation with midsize and large particles. Underestimations occurred when Dm and Nw are both very large, and the severe underestimations for heavy rain are mainly due to these particles. It is verified that some of these particles are associated with melting hail. Owing to the big differences in DSD characteristics, R(KDP, ZDR) underestimates most heavy rain. Therefore, R(AH), which is least sensitive to DSD variations, replaces R(KDP, ZDR) to estimate precipitation. This improved algorithm performs well even for extremely heavy rain. These results are important for evaluating S-band Doppler radar polarization updates in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Academic Search Index |
Full Text Finder