دورية أكاديمية
How insurgencies end: The Quest for Government Victory ; Cómo terminan las insurgencias: En busca de la victoria del gobierno
| العنوان: | How insurgencies end: The Quest for Government Victory ; Cómo terminan las insurgencias: En busca de la victoria del gobierno |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Plakoudas, Spyridon |
| المصدر: | Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova; Vol. 17 No. 28 (2019): Contemporary wars and their effect on the Military Forces; 923-938 ; Revista Científica General José María Córdova; Vol. 17 Núm. 28 (2019): Guerras contemporáneas y su efecto en las Fuerzas Militares; 923-938 ; Revista Científica General José María Córdova; Vol. 17 No. 28 (2019): Guerras contemporáneas y su efecto en las Fuerzas Militares; 923-938 ; Revista Científica General José María Córdova; v. 17 n. 28 (2019): Guerras contemporáneas y su efecto en las Fuerzas Militares; 923-938 ; 2500-7645 ; 1900-6586 |
| بيانات النشر: | Sello Editorial ESMIC - Escuela Militar de Cadetes "General José María Córdova" |
| سنة النشر: | 2019 |
| المجموعة: | Revista Científica General José María Córdova (Revista colombiana de estudios militares y estratégicos - RCGJMC) |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Counterinsurgency strategy, enemy-centric, military victory, peace settlement, population centric, stalemate, Acuerdo de paz, centrado en el enemigo, centrado en la población, estancamiento, estrategia de contrainsurgencia, victoria militar |
| الوصف: | Insurgency is currently the most prevalent type of war. However, success in irregular warfare cannot be quantified and measured with absolute certainty. This paper will examine how insurgencies end and how a government can achieve the optimum scenario, military victory. An insurgency could end in three possible ways: a (military) victory for the insurgents or the regime, a peace deal, or a stalemate. However, war constantly evolves; therefore, the above three scenarios can manifest at any time during the course of an insurgency. Therefore, the state should use a balanced mix of reforms and repression. A state must implement a situation-dependent policy that includes good governance and outside support, that ensures the welfare and security of the population, buttressed by an adequate narrative. ; Actualmente, la insurgencia es el tipo de guerra más frecuente. Sin embargo, el éxito en la guerra irregular no puede cuantificarse y medirse con absoluta certeza. Este documento examina cómo terminan las insurgencias y cómo un gobierno puede lograr el escenario óptimo: la victoria militar. Una insurgencia podría terminar de tres maneras: una victoria (militar) para los insurgentes o el régimen, un acuerdo de paz o un estancamiento. La guerra, no obstante, evoluciona constantemente; por lo tanto, los tres escenarios anteriores pueden manifestarse durante el curso de una insurgencia. En consecuencia, el Estado debe implementar una mezcla equilibrada de reformas y represión: una política dependiente de la situación, que incluya una gobernanza justa y apoyo externo, que garantice el bienestar y la seguridad de la población y que sea respaldada por una narrativa adecuada. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
| اللغة: | English Spanish; Castilian |
| العلاقة: | https://revistacientificaesmic.com/index.php/esmic/article/view/523/576Test; https://revistacientificaesmic.com/index.php/esmic/article/view/523/635Test; Alderson, A. (2007a). Counter-insurgency: Learn and Adapt? Can We Do Better? British Army Review, 142, 16-21.; Alderson, A. (2007b). Learning, Adapting, Applying US Counter-insurgency Doctrine and Practice. RUSI Journal, 152(6), 12-19.; Amend, K. (2010). Counterinsurgency principles for the diplomat. Orbis, 45(2), 222-226.; Amidror, Y. (2010). Winning counterinsurgency war: The Israeli experience. Strategic Perspectives, 2, 1-42.; Arreguin-Toft, I. (2005). How the weak win wars: A theory of asymmetric conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.; Barrett, T. J. (2009). Operationalizing economics for counterinsurgency and stability operations (pp. 43-44). Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: US Army Command and General Staff College.; Beckett, I. (2007). Victory, counter-insurgency and Iraq. In I. Duyvesteyn, & J. Ångström (Eds.), Understanding victory and defeat in contemporary war. London: Routledge.; Benjamin, M., & Davies, N. J. S. (2018). The staggering death toll in Iraq. Salon. Retrieved from https://www.salon.com/2018/03/19/the-staggering-death-toll-in-iraq_partnerTest/; Berman, E., Shapiro, J. N., & Felter, J. H. (2011). Can hearts and minds be bought? The economics of counterinsurgency in Iraq. Journal of Political Economy, 119(4), 766-819.; Bernstein, J. (2012). Negotiating the insurgency: The case for settling Afghanistan’s war and securing “negative” peace. Yale Journal of International Affairs, 7(1), 23-37.; Byman, D., Chalk, P., Hoffman, B., Rosenau, W., & Brannan, D. (2001). Trends in outside support for insurgent movements. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.; Byman, D. (2006). Friends like these: Counterinsurgency and the war on terrorism. International Security, 31(2), 79-115.; Byman, D. (2009). Talking with insurgents: A guide for the perplexed. Washington Quarterly, 32(2), 127-129.; Call, C. T., & Cousens, E. M. (2008). Ending wars and building peace: International responses to war-torn societies. International Studies Perspectives, 9(1), 1-21.; Campbell, J., O’Hanlon, M., & Shapiro, J. (2009). Assessing counterinsurgency and stabilization missions. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institute.; Cassidy, R. M. (2008). Counterinsurgency and the global war on terror: Military cultures and irregular war. Westport: Praeger Security International.; Clancy, J., & Crosset, C. (2007). Measuring effectiveness in irregular warfare. Parameters, 37(2), 88-100.; Cohen, E., Crane, C., Horvath, J., & Nagl., J. (2006). Principles, imperatives and paradoxes of counterinsurgency. Military Review, 86(2), 49-53.; Connable, B., & Libicki, M. C. (2010). How insurgencies end. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.; Connable, B. (2013). Leveraging development aid to address root causes in counterinsurgency: Balancing theory and practice in “hold” and “build.” Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.; Cordesman, A. H. (2005). The Iraq war and its strategic lessons for counterinsurgency. Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.; Cordesman, A. H. (2006). The importance of building local capabilities: Lessons from the counterinsurgency in Iraq. Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.; Cornish, P. (2009). The United States and counterinsurgency: ‘Political first, political last, political always. International Affairs, 85(1), 76-78.; Cox, D. G., & Bruscino, T. (Eds.). (2011). Population-centric counterinsurgency: A false idol? Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: US Army Combined Arms Center.; Derouen, K., Bercovitch, J., & Wei, J. (2009). Duration of peace and recurring civil wars in Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Civil Wars, 11(2), 103-120.; DeVore, M. R. (2013). Institutions, culture and counterinsurgency operations: Why do States fight similar insurgencies differently? Comparative Strategy, 32(3), 169-191.; Duyvesteyn, I., & Schuurman, B. (2011). The paradoxes of negotiating with terrorist and insurgent organisations. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 39(4), 678-679.; Elbadawi, I., & Sambanis, N. (2000). External interventions and the duration of civil wars. Washington DC: World Bank.; Elbadawi, I., & Sambanis, N. (2002). How much war will we see? Explaining the prevalence of civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(3), 307-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702046003001Test; Etzioni, A. (2011). Whose COIN? Joint Force Quarterly, 60(1), 21-22.; Fishstein, P., & Wilder, A. (2012). Winning hearts and minds? Examining the relationship between aid and security in Afghanistan. Medford, MA: Tufts University, Feinstein International Center.; Fitzsimmons, M. F. (2009). Governance, identity and counterinsurgency strategy (Ph.D. Thesis). University of Maryland, College Park.; Galula, D. (1964). Counterinsurgency warfare: Theory and practice. Westport, CT: Praeger.; Gentile, G. P. (2009). A strategy of tactics: Population-centric COIN and the Army. Parameters, 39(3), 11-15.; Gompert, D. C., Kelly, T., Stearns Lawson, B., Parker, M., & Colloton, K. (2009). Reconstruction under fire: Unifying civil and military counterinsurgency. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.; Gorka, S., & David Kilcullen, D. (2011). An actor-centric theory of war: Understanding the difference between COIN and counterinsurgency. Joint Force Quarterly, 60(1), 14-18.; Greenhill, K. M., & Major, S. (2006-2007). The perils of profiling: Civil war spoilers and the collapse of intrastate peace accords. International Security, 31(3), 7-40.; Gregg, H. S. (2009). Beyond population engagement: Understanding counterinsurgency. Parameters, 39(3), 23-25.; Handel, M. (1981). Weak states in the international system. London: Cass.; Handel, M. (1992). Masters of war: classical strategic thought (1st ed.). London: Frank Cass.; Hartzell, C., & Hoddie, M. (2003). Institutionalizing peace: Power sharing and post-civil war conflict management. American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 318-332.; Hazelton, J. L. (2013). The false promise of the governance model of counterinsurgency warfare. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Political Studies Association (APSA), “Power and Persuasion.” Illinois (USA), 29 August–1 September.; Henry, L. W. (2006). What is the role of negotiations when countering an insurgency? (MA Thesis). US Naval Postgraduate School, Monterrey, California.; Heuser, B. (2010). The evolution of strategy: thinking war from antiquity to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.; Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Neo-classical counterinsurgency? Parameters, 37(2), 1-17. Joes, A. J. (1996). Guerrilla warfare: A historical, biographical and bibliographical sourcebook. Westport, CT; London: Greenwood Press. Johnston, P. B. (2007). Negotiated settlements and government strategy in civil war: Evidence from Darfur. Civil Wars, 9(4), 559-577.; Jones, D. (2006). Understanding measures of effectiveness in counterinsurgency operations. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: US Army Command and General Staff College.; Kalyvas, S. N. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.; Kaufmann, C. (1996). Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars. International Security, 20(4), 136-175.; Kilcullen, D. (2006). Three pillars of counterinsurgency. Remarks delivered at the U.S. Government Counterinsurgency Conference. Washington DC (USA), 28 September.; Kilcullen, D. (2009). The accidental guerrilla: Fighting small wars in the midst of a big one. London: Hurst.; Kilcullen, D. (2010). Intelligence. In T. Rid, & T. Keaney (Eds.), Understanding counterinsurgency: Doctrine, operations and challenges. London; New York: Routledge.; Kilcullen, D. (2012). Counterinsurgency: The state of a controversial art. In P. B. Rich, & I. Duyvesteyn (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of insurgency and counterinsurgency. London: Routledge.; Kiras, J. D. (2008). Irregular warfare. In D. Jordan et al. (Eds.), Understanding modern warfare (pp. 224-291). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.; Kitson, F. (Sir). (1971). Low intensity operations: Subversion, insurgency and peacekeeping. London: Faber and Faber.; Kitson, F. (Sir). (1977). Bunch of five. London: Faber and Faber.; Kitzen, M. (2012). Western military culture and counterinsurgency: An ambiguous reality. Scientia Militaria: South African Journal of Military Studies, 40(1), 1-24.; Licklider, R. (1993). What have we learned and where do we go from here? In R. Licklider (Comp.), Stopping the killing (pp. 306-315). New York: New York University Press.; Licklider, R. E. (1993). Stopping the killing: how civil wars end. New York: New York University Press.; Licklider, R. (1995). The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945-1993. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 681-690.; Luttwak, E. (1999). Give war a chance. Foreign Affairs, 78(4), 36-44.; Mack, A. (1975). Why big nations lose small wars: The politics of asymmetric conflict. World Politics, 27(2), 199-200.; Manwaring, M. (2001). Internal wars: Rethinking problem and response. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.; Marks, T. (1992). Making revolution: Sendero Luminoso in Peru. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 3(1), 22-46.; Mason, D. T., Weingarten, J. P., Jr., & Fett, P. J. (1999). Win, lose or draw: Predicting the outcome of civil wars. Political Research Quarterly, 52(2), 239-268.; Mason, D. (2007). Sustaining the peace after civil war. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.; Mattes, M., & Savun, B. (2009). Fostering peace after civil war: Commitment problems and agreement design. International Studies Quarterly, 53(3), 737-759.; McCormick, G. H., Horton, S. H., & Harrison, L. A. (2009). Things fall apart: The endgame dynamics of internal wars. In M. T. Barger, & D. A. Borer (Eds.), The long war: Insurgency, counterinsurgency and collapsing States. Abingdon: Routledge.; McFate, M., & Jackson, A. V. (2006). The object beyond war: Counterinsurgency and the four tools of political competition. Military Review, 86(15), 13-26.; Moyar, M. (2011). Development in Afghanistan’s counterinsurgency: A new guide. McLean, Washington D.C.: Orbis Operations.; Nagl, J. (2005). Learning to eat soup with a knife: Counterinsurgency lessons from Malaya and Vietnam. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.; O’Neill, B. (2005). From revolution to apocalypse: Insurgency and terrorism. Washington D.C.: Potomac Books. Paul, C., Clarke, C. P., & Grill, B. (2010). Victory has a thousand fathers, sources of success in counterinsurgency. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.; Plakoudas, S. (2015). Strategy in counterinsurgency: A distilled approach. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 38(2), 132-133.; Plakoudas, S. (2017). Doomed from the start? Peace negotiations in the Greek Civil War, January-July 1947. Balkan Studies, 50, 135-159.; Plakoudas, S. (2018). Insurgency and counter-insurgency in Turkey: The new PKK. London; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.; Preston, M. (2004). Stalemate and the termination of civil wars: Rhodesia reassessed. Journal of Peace Research, 41(1), 65-83.; Pruitt, D. G. (2005). Whither ripeness theory? Retrieved from https://gsdrc.org/document-library/whither-ripeness-theoryTest/; Rabasa, A., & Haseman, J. B. (2002a). The military and democracy in Indonesia: Challenges, politics, and power. Retrieved from http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212Test; Rabasa, A., & Haseman J. B. (2002b). The military and democracy in Indonesia: Challenges, politics and power. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.; Record, J. (2006). External assistance: Enabler of insurgent success. Parameters, 36(3), 36-49.; Regan, P. M. (2000). Third-party interventions and the duration of intrastate conflicts. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Political Science Association (APSA), Boston (USA), 28 August.; Reiter, D. (2003). Exploring the Bargaining model of war. Perspectives on Politics, 1(1), 27-43. Salehyan, I. (2008). No shelter here: Rebel sanctuaries and international conflict. Journal of Politics, 70(1), 54-66.; Salehyan, I., Gleditsch, K. S., & Cunningham, D. E. (2011). Explaining external support for insurgent groups. International Organization, 64(4), 709-744.; Sepp, K. (2005). Best practices in counterinsurgency. Military Review, 85(3), 8-12.; Schadlow, N. (2010). Governance. In T. Rid, & T. Keaney (Eds.), Understanding counterinsurgency: Doctrine, operations and challenges. London; New York: Routledge.; Shafer, M. D. (1988). Deadly paradigms: The failure of US Counterinsurgency Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.; Stedman, S. J. (1997). Spoiler problems in peace processes. International Security, 22(2), 5-53.; Springer, N. R. (2011). Stabilizing the debate between population-centric and enemy-centric counterinsurgency: Success demands a balanced approach (MA Thesis). US Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.; Staniland, P. (2005-2006). Defeating transnational insurgencies: The best offense is a good fence. The Washington Quarterly, 29(1), 21-40.; Taber, R. (2002). War of the Flea: The classic study of guerrilla warfare. New York: Potomac Books.; Themnér, L. L., & Wallensteen, P. (2013). Armed conflicts, 1946-2012: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 50(4). 509-521.; Thompson, R. (Sir). (1966). Defeating communist insurgency: Experiences from Malaya and Vietnam. London: Macmillan.; Toft, M. D. (2005). End of victory? Civil war termination in historical perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA), Honolulu (USA), 3 May.; Toft, M. D. (2009). Securing the peace: The durable settlement of civil wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.; Trinquier, R. (1964). Modern warfare: A French view of counterinsurgency (Daniel Lee, Trans.). New York: Praeger.; Wagner, H. B. (2000). Bargaining and war. American Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 464-484.; Walter, B. F. (1999). Designing transitions from civil war: Demobilization, democratization and commitments to peace. International Security, 24(1), 127-155.; Walter, B. F. (2002). Committing to peace: The successful settlement of civil wars. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.; Walter, B. F. (2013). Civil wars, conflict resolution, and Bargaining theory. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 664-665). London: SAGE.; Van Creveld, M. (2008). The changing face of war: Combat from the Marne to Iraq. New York: Presidio Press.; Zartman, W. I. (1993). The unfinished agenda: Negotiating internal conflict. In R. Licklider (Ed.), Stopping the killing: How civil wars end. New York: New York University Press.; Zartman, W. I. (1995). Dynamics and constraints in negotiations in internal conflicts. In I. William Zartman (Ed.), Elusive peace: Negotiating an end to civil wars. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.; Zartman, W. I. (2001). The timing of peace initiatives: Hurting stalemates and ripe moments. Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 1(1), 8-18.; Zhukov, Y. (2007). Examining the authoritarian model of counter-insurgency: The Soviet campaign against the Ukrainian insurgent army. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 18(3), 458-460.; Zhukov, Y. (2014). A theory of indiscriminate violence (Ph.D. Thesis). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.; https://revistacientificaesmic.com/index.php/esmic/article/view/523Test |
| DOI: | 10.21830/19006586.523 |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.523Test https://revistacientificaesmic.com/index.php/esmic/article/view/523Test |
| حقوق: | Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Científica General José María Córdova ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Test |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.13148576 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.21830/19006586.523 |
|---|