دورية أكاديمية

Waist-to-Height Ratio Is Independently Related to Whole and Central Body Fat, Regardless of the Waist Circumference Measurement Protocol, in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Waist-to-Height Ratio Is Independently Related to Whole and Central Body Fat, Regardless of the Waist Circumference Measurement Protocol, in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients
المؤلفون: Pimenta, NM, Cortez-Pinto, H, Melo, X, Silva-Nunes, J, Sardinha, LB, Santa-Clara, H
بيانات النشر: Wiley
سنة النشر: 2017
المجموعة: Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central EPE
مصطلحات موضوعية: Absorptiometry, Photon, Adult, Aged, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Body Height, Body Mass Index, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Risk Factors, Adiposity, Waist Circumference, Waist-Height Ratio, HCC END
الوصف: BACKGROUND: Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) has been reported as a preferable risk related body fat (BF) marker, although no standardised waist circumference measurement protocol (WCmp) has been proposed. The present study aimed to investigate whether the use of a different WCmp affects the strength of relationship between WHtR and both whole and central BF in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. METHODS: BF was assessed with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 28 NAFLD patients [19 males, mean (SD) 51 (13) years and nine females, 47 (13) years]. All subjects also underwent anthropometric evaluation including height and waist circumference (WC) measurement using four different WCmp (WC1, minimal waist; WC2, iliac crest; WC3, mid-distance between iliac crest and lowest rib; WC4, at the umbilicus) and WHtR was calculated using each WC measurements (WHtR1, WHtR2, WHtR3 and WHtR4, respectively). Partial correlations were conducted to assess the relation of WHtR and DXA assessed BF. RESULTS: All WHtR were particularly correlated with central BF, including abdominal BF (r = 0.80, r = 0.84, r = 0.84 and r = 0.78, respectively, for WHtR1, WHtR2, WHtR3 and WHtR4) and central abdominal BF (r = 0.72, r = 0.77, r = 0.76 and r = 0.71, respectively, for WHtR1, WHtR2, WHtR3 and WHtR4), after controlling for age, sex and body mass index. There were no differences between the correlation coefficients obtained between all studied WHtR and each whole and central BF variable. CONCLUSIONS: Waist-to-height ratio was found a suitable BF marker in the present sample of NAFLD patients and the strength of the relationship between WHtR and both whole and central BF was not altered by using different WCmp in the present sample of NAFLD patients. ; info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
العلاقة: J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;30(2):185-192.; http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3209Test
DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12410
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12410Test
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3209Test
حقوق: openAccess
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.3050332D
قاعدة البيانات: BASE