يعرض 1 - 5 نتائج من 5 نتيجة بحث عن '"Riqueza de Especies"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.91s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    دورية أكاديمية
  2. 2
    دورية أكاديمية
  3. 3
    دورية أكاديمية

    المصدر: Revista Novedades Colombianas; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2010): Enero - Diciembre - Novedades Colombianas ; 2145-5236 ; 0121-3520

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    العلاقة: https://revistas.unicauca.edu.co/index.php/novedades/article/view/1175/968Test; Blackburn, T. M. y K. J. Gaston. 1996. Spatial patterns in the geographic range sizes of bird species in the New World. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B., 351: 897–912.; Brown, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 270 pp.; Brown, J. H. 2001. Mammals on mountainsides: elevational patterns of diversity. Global Ecology and Biodiversity, 10: 101–109.; Brown, J. H. y M. V. Lomolino. 1998. Biogeography. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. 692 pp.; Colwell, R. K. y G. C. Hurtt. 1994. Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious Rapoport effect. American Naturalist, 144: 570–595.; Diniz-Filho, J. y N. Tôrres. 2002. Rapoport effect in South American carnivora (Mammalia): null models under geometric and phylogenetic constraints. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 62 (3): 437-444.; Frost, D. 2009. Amphibian Species of the World an Online Reference. Version 5.3 (12 February 2009). Electronic Database. http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/ampTest hibia/index.php. Consultada el 11 Marzo de 2009.; Gaston, K. J. 1996. Species range-size distributions: patterns, mechanisms and implications. Trends in ecology and evolution, 11: 197–201.; Gaston, K.J. 1999. Why Rapoport’s rule does not generalize. Oikos, 84: 309-312.; Gaston, K.J. y T.M. Blackburn. 1999. A critique for macroecology. Oikos, 84: 353-368.; Gaston, K.J. y T.M. Blackburn. 2000. Pattern and Process in Macroecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford. 377 pp.; Gaston, K. J. y S. L. Chown. 1999. Why Rapoport’s rule does not generalize. Oikos, 84: 309–312.; Gaston, K., T. Blackburn y J. Spicer. 1998. Rapoport’s rule: Time for an epitaph?. Trends in ecology and evolution, 13(2): 70-74.; Gotelli, N. y G. Graves. 1996. Null models in Ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press Washington. 368 pp.; Harcourt, A. H. 2000. Latitude and latitudinal extent: a global analysis of the Rapoport effect in a tropical mammalian taxon: primates. Journal of Biogeography, 27: 1169–1182.; Heaney, L.R. 2001. Small mammal diversity along elevational gradients in the Philippines: an assessment of patterns and hypotheses. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10: 15–39.; Hedges, B., W. Duellman y M. Heinicke. 2008. New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): Molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa, 1737: 1-182.; Heinicke, M., W. Duellman y B. Hedges. 2007. Major Caribbean and Central American frog faunas originated by ancient oceanic dispersal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104 (24): 10092-10097.; Husak, M. S. y A. Husak. L. 2003. Latitudinal patterns in range sizes of new world woodpeckers. The Southwestern Naturalist, 48 (1): 61-69.; International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The World Conservation Union.2009. Red List of Threatened Species. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.orgTest.; Kendall, V. J. y R. Haedrich. 2006. Species richness in Atlantic deep-sea fishes assessed in terms of the mid-domain effect and Rapoport’s rule. Elsevier, 53: 506-515.; Kerr, J. T. 1998. Weak links: ‘Rapoport’s rule’ and large scale species richness patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 8: 47-54.; Letcher, A. J. y P. H. Harvey. 1994. Variation in geographical range size among mammals of the Palearctic. American Naturalist, 144: 30–42.; Lynch, J. D. 1998. New species of Eleutherodactylus from the Cordillera Occidental of western Colombia with a synopsis of the distributions of species in western Colombia. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias, 22 (82): 117-148.; Lynch J. D. 1999. Ranas pequeñas, la geometría de evolución y la especiación en los Andes colombianos. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias, 23 (86): 143-159.; Lynch, J. D. y W. E. Duellman. 1997. Frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus in western Ecuador: systematics, ecology, and biogeography. The University of Kansas Natural History Museum, Special Publication, 23: 1 - 236.; Lyons, S. y M. Willig. 1997. Latitudinal patterns of range size: methodological concerns and empirical evaluations for New World bats and marsupials. Oikos, 79: 568 - 580.; McCain, C. M. 2005. Elevational gradients in diversity of small mammals. Ecology, 86: 366 - 372.; Mittelbach, G. G., D. W. Schemske, H. V. Cornell, et al. 2007. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecology Letters, 10: 315 - 331.; Padial, J. M., C-F. Santiago y R. Ignacio. 2009. The phylogenetic relationships of Yunganastes revisited (Anura: Terrarana). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 52: 911 - 915.; Pagel, M. D., R. M. May y A. R. Collie. 1991. Ecological aspects of the geographical distribution and diversity of mammalian species. American Naturalist, 137: 791 -815.; Patterson, B.D., V. Pacheco y S. Solari. 1996. Distribution of bats along an elevation gradient in the Andes of south-eastern Peru. Journal of Zoology, 240: 637–658.; Rahbek, C. 1995. The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography, 18: 200 - 205.; Rohde, K. 1996. Rapoport’s rule is a local phenomenon and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species diversity. Biodiversity Letters, 3: 10 - 13.; Rohde, K., M. Heap y D. Heap. 1993. Rapoport’s rule does not apply to marine teleosts and can not explain latitudinal gradients in species richness. American Naturalist, 142: 1 - 16.; Rosenzweig, M. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 436 pp.; Roy, K., D. Jablonski, J. W. Valentine y D G. Rosenberg. 1998. Marine latitudinal diversity gradients: tests of causal hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 91: 3699 - 3702.; Smith, F., R. May y P. Harvey. 1994. Geographical ranges of Australian mammals. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63:441 - 450.; Smith, S., A. Nieto, T. Reeder y J. Wiens. 2007. A phylogenetic perspective on elevational species richness patterns in middle America treefrogs: why so few species in lowland tropical rainforest?. Evolution, 61 (5): 1188 - 1207.; StatSoft, Inc. 2004. STATISTICA (data analysis software system). Ver. 7. www.statsoft.com; Stevens, G. C. 1989. The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. American Naturalist, 133: 240 - 256.; Stevens, G. C. 1992. The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: an extension of Rapoport’s latitudinal rule to altitude. American Naturalist, 140: 893 - 911.; Stevens, G. C. y B. J. Enquist. 1998. Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus. Pp. 183-190. En: Richardsons D. M. (Ed.). Macroecological limits to the abundance and distribution of the genus Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 527 pp.; Terborgh, J. 1973. On the notion of favourableness in plant ecology. American Naturalist, 107: 481 - 501.; Terborgh, J. 1977. Bird species diversity on an Andean elevational gradient. Ecology, 58: 1007 - 1019.; Wiens, J. 2007. Global patterns of diversification and species richness in amphibians. The American Naturalist, 170: 86 - 106.; Wieters, E. 2001. Marine macroecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16: 67 - 69.; Willig, M. y S. Lyons. 1998. An analytical model of latitudinal gradients of species richness with a empirical test for marsupials and bats in a New World. Oikos, 81: 93 - 98.; https://revistas.unicauca.edu.co/index.php/novedades/article/view/1175Test

  4. 4
    دورية أكاديمية
  5. 5
    دورية أكاديمية